|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Tonight I hooked up a vacuum gauge to the manifold on my stock '57 312 Fairlane and cruised around at various speeds from 30-70 mph, uphill and downhill, both with and without the vacuum advance hooked up. I wanted to see what difference the timing change would make before I started trying to recurve the distributor.
The distributor is stock and the mechanical curve is close to what the shop manual specifies but the vacuum advance is a bit more aggressive. According to what I have gleaned from this site it's far too much advance. The motor runs well but the fuel economy is pretty sorry (best average so far is 12.5 mpg) and the temperature creeps up to the upper limit of the "normal" bar at speeds of 60 mph and up. Of course, the mpg and temp issues could be caused by bad alignment due to a worn-out front suspension and/or faults in the cooling system, but seeing as the stock advance curve isn't optimized for today's fuel, I thought I'd start there.
What I found was that, in general, disconnecting the vacuum advance resulted in slightly lower vacuum numbers at low speeds (20-40 mph) and slightly higher vacuum readings at highway speeds (55-70 mph). Regardless of speed or presence/absence of vacuum advance, maintaining speed up a moderate grade put the vacuum around 10-13". Accelerating up a grade at highway speeds brought it under 10". Cruising vacuum at my best guess of a level-ground scenario was about 17-18" at most speeds, dropping to more like 15-17.5" at 60-70 mph. Downhills of course brought vacuum over 20" at any speed, if steep enough.
When driving, that needle moves around a lot more than I expected. It was hard to pin down a change with/without the vacuum advance. It seemed to me that, without the advance on the highway, I saw an overall average of about 16.5"Hg as opposed to an average of about 15"Hg with vac adv. At low speeds, average without vac adv was about 16" and with vac adv was closer to 17.5".
So, if manifold vacuum is a good measure of engine efficiency, it seems that the degree of variation in efficiency to be had by making significant changes to the total advance curve is not very large. Now, it's true that my test scenarios were both "extremes"; I'm sure there was too much advance in most instances with the vac adv hooked up and probably less advance than was desirable with it disconnected. Still, even with the optimum curve I wouldn't expect to see a blatantly obvious increase on the numbers I mentioned here. Improvement would be by small degrees moment-by-moment, but I suppose they add up.
For those who've driven with a gauge, do those readings sound consistent with your experience?
|
|
By Talkwrench - 11 Years Ago
|
Those figures are pretty much "ball park" for anything other than electronically controlled. now you need to get a dial back timing light to start marking where your curve is and seeing how much extra vacuum you have. This came at a good time as I was about to ask Ted ..hello Ted are you there! As to timing and his experience timing Yblocks and where they make best power etc. I think we have established that they like double their initial timing say 12 degrees, now where should the total timing all in be 2500... 3000 - 3750 rpm etc?? My timing is all in well before 2500rpm [I have the Mr gasket springs and modified timing plate] , even with vacuum , im not detonating however Im wondering IF perhaps its "falling on its face" a bit ???
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
Hey Talkwrench, here is a link to a thread where I went through distributor curving a few years ago on a different car I had.
You actually posted in that particular thread and the curve you had sounds pretty similar to mine, with total advance over 50* at higher rpms. Oldcarmark suggests that so much advance will give drivability problems like missing or surging, but I have no such issues. No pinging either.
I still intend to "optimize" my curve as Greenbird describes in that link.
|
|
By Talkwrench - 11 Years Ago
|
Thanks I will look at it now.. Guess it depends on your fuel amongst other things, The YBlock timing seems to be able to go to 36 + total , advance well over 50 with vacuum on cruise is not uncommon in vehicles.
|
|
By rick55 - 11 Years Ago
|
From my experience your vacuum readings whilst driving are unusually high. Idle vacuum should be around 18-20", drive should be around 10-15" and acceleration should be below 10". Deceleration should get up towards high 20's". The power valve in the carburettor is calibrated against the vacuum signal so it opens when's you need the extra fuel. If you are getting 18" at 70mph your economy should be through the roof. My engine with 280' cam and head work gets around 15" vacuum and who knows when it is running but I get around 17mpg though the imperial gallon is a little bigger than the US gallon. I run it on 91RON with absolutely no sign of pinging at any speed.
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Talkwrench, you say vacuum over 50 degrees at cruise is not uncommon--where are you drawing that knowledge from? I wonder what curves look like for cars of the late 80s/early 90s when manufacturers started using distributorless systems on engine designs that were formerly carbureted.
Rick55, 70 mph was more like 16-17" on level ground but as you say I'd expect at least 14 mpg at that speed. My '62 New Yorker with a 413 did nearly 15 mpg at 70. I really have to wait on the economy expectations until I rebuild the front suspension. Tires are wider than stock too. It's helpful to know that my numbers at least aren't lower than they should be.
|
|
By Talkwrench - 11 Years Ago
|
Mmm out of my brian ; o ) I remember when doing my Mopar stuff .. Think srcubs might be similar>? Found this.
Move on to setting your mechanical advance timing. Insure that the emergency brake is set so no one gets killed. Set the dial of the timing gun to the 35 degree mark, shoot the balancer and slowly bring the engine up to 2500rpm. This will clearly be easier with the extra help of someone sitting in the car to bring the revs up. Turn the distributor until the light falls back down to the 0 degree mark on the balancer. Secure the lockdown on the distributor, tell your buddy to get off the gas, and consider your mechanical advance set. Total timing equals initial plus mechanical, not including vacuum advance (that's why the vacuum is unplugged). So in this example the total advance is "all in" by 2500rpm and for most small block MoPar engines, this is a good place to have it. If initial timing is 17 degrees and mechanical advance (total) timing was set at 35 degrees @ 2500rpm, then: Total timing (35º) = initial (17º) + mechanical (18º) "all in" at 2500rpm. Plug the vacuum hose back into the distributor. You will notice the timing mark shift to well over 50 degrees. It's cool, vacuum advance has just been introduced into the system and its function is to provide extra advance when a vacuum signal is present to improve fuel economy (or so I've been told). Because this is in addition to your initial and mechanical advance (aka your total advance) you notice the degree spike when it's plugged in. The amount of advance can be adjusted by swapping out different vacuum canisters or by putting on an aftermarket adjustable canister. Unless you are a hard core racer, most of the time this is not worth the trouble.
|
|
By charliemccraney - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Talk,
The only way to change the rate and amount of mechanical advance is to open the distributor and change the springs and weights. What you have described in the first paragraph merely sets the initial advance. Yes, there will be 35 degrees at 2500rpm but that will not be the max and it will most likely continue to advance if it is a stock distributor.
|
|
By Talkwrench - 11 Years Ago
|
Yes I didn't write that I just cut an paste it just to show the one paragraph about the timing going over 50 degrees on cruise with vacuum. The rate is determined by the springs the mechanical is limited by the timing plate, slots , pegs whatever it has..
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
I can imagine that, given a sufficiently slow-burning mixture and combustion chamber design, that 50+ degrees could be suitable for a cruise load on an engine.
What I have noticed in all my web research on this subject is that people have a better grasp on what is needed from the mechanical side than from the vacuum side. The mechanical is a bit more obvious, I think. When an engine is at WOT, too much timing will always make itself known by spark knock or worse. It is advantageous for power and efficiency to give any street engine all the timing it can take at WOT short of spark knocking--that way, all of the expanding power of the mixture is spent pushing the piston in the right direction. I'm not an expert so I'm prepared to be corrected and told that maximum timing short of knocking at WOT is not always the ideal; that's just the understanding that I have to date.
Outside of the WOT scenario, however, things are more complicated, and it is harder to tell whether your spark is igniting the mixture at the optimum time. How big is the cushion for optimum efficiency? Or, put differently, what is the range in degrees of advance within which a given engine at a given speed, load, and throttle percentage will perform the same? Is more vacuum advance always better up to the point that drivability issues become evident? Articles detailing that sort of information are very scarce.
When I disconnected my vacuum advance, I shaved off 24 degrees (!) of advance any time the vacuum port saw 10"Hg or more, which is 95% of the time I was driving. That enormous change resulted in such a small difference at the manifold vacuum gauge that I wasn't really certain whether there WAS a real change, as far as performance/economy. The car didn't really feel different either. Yet, performance, or at least economy, HAS to have been different, as 24* is significant.
|
|
By Talkwrench - 11 Years Ago
|
'Tis a black art for sure for the average guy.. I've been playing around with my little herald that runs manifold vacuum because of the SU carbs, total for that motor should be no more than about 30 degrees, the flathead V8 , 24 ( without vacuum ) all so different .. I was hoping Ted might give us a clue as to ' best' timing. I recently read that ' racers' of the y blocks timed for about 38 degrees and all in at 3600 rpm.. But maybe that when you had good fuel and you could actually read sparkplugs??
|
|
By Ted - 11 Years Ago
|
|
The auto manufacturers have been struggling with the ignition advance curve for 120 years now and are just now getting a solid handle on it. It’s tough for a single advance curve to cover all the different drivers and driving conditions even when the engines remain the same.
Full throttle timing attributes differ from cruise timing attributes. This has to to do with the air/fuel mixture being in the neighborhood of 12.5:1 at full throttle and 14.5-14.7:1 under cruise conditions. There is no standard ignition advance curve that can be applied to all situations as carburetion, intake manifolds, compression ratio, and camming all play into this. The vacuum advance chamber does allow for the increase in timing under cruise situations and still allow the timing to backup under full throttle by lieu of the vacuum signal to the distributor dropping off when the manifold vacuum drops off. But here are some basic guide lines. As fuel mixtures get leaner, then additional ignition advance is required in the lower rpm bands. The lower the compression ratio, then more total ignition timing is also required than what would be necessary on a higher compression engine.
As the camshaft lobe centerline is decreased, then additional initial ignition timing at low rpms helps with the idle characteristics. This is simply due to inefficiencies taking place in the combustion chamber and the additional initial ignition advance simply helps to start the combustion burn earlier to help combat those ineffeciencies. This in turn requires a shorter advance curve so that there is not too much ignition advance at full throttle and in the higher rpm ranges. Because a street engine is operated under a variety of conditions, the combination of mechanical and vacuum advance helps to cover these. Moderate acceleration has the vacuum advance dropping off which in turn results in less ignition advance seen by the engine. Once the engine rpms are held in steady state (cruise), the air/fuel mixture goes leaner which is where the vacuum advance helps by adding additional degrees of ignition advance on top of what is already being supplied by the mechanical advance portion ofthe distributor. Leaner mixtures are more difficult to start the burn cycle which is why the ignition must be advanced in which to compensate.
On the race engines, total timing is the single attribute I aim for and I simply want an initial timing that allows the engine to startup without ‘ignition locking’. Cruising ignition timing attributes are not required and are therefore not taken into account. On my roadster, total timing is set at 36° BTDC with the MSD electronics automatically retarding the timing 20° when the starter is engaged. Once the starter button is released, timing is at 36° both at idle and at speed. I do have the capability with the MSD to put some additional retard into the system with a switch if desired. This would allow a 40-42° ignition advance off the line and if the switch is put on the shifter, then a 4 or 6° ignition retard could be made when the car goes to high gear. While I did that with my FE powered cars, I’m currently not doing that with the Y powered roadster but the capability is there if desired for a harder launch with the additional advance (42°) and still maintain a strong mph with the original timing (36°).
With all that being said, 10-12° intial and 36-38° total at 3500 rpms works well for many street Y’s. As the camshafts get wilder, then 18-20° initial at idle may work better but this requires that the curve within the distributor be shortened so that the total advance without the vacuum advance is not excessive. As a general rule, don’t exceed 10° of additional timing with the vacuum advance activated.
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Thanks for that overview Ted. Do you know why the 10 degree limit for vacuum advance is the rule of thumb?
I have a little more info on my own scenario. I drove 126 miles on a ~40 mile route involving mostly highway cruising at 65 and a good chunk of country 55 mph roads. I drove this route from a destination, back to that destination, and then from it a second time before having to fill up. I used google maps to determine the exact route length rather than using the odometer and I acheived 7.82 mpg on the whole route.
I was able to monitor the manifold vacuum really clearly this time. The first leg was made with the vacuum advance connected; it was what prompted me to hook up the vacuum gauge and write this post. The second leg was made with the advance disconnected, and the third with it connected again. All of that driving really just confirmed what I posted before: cruising uphill at any speed 50 and up was 13-14"Hg. Steady cruising at any speed was 15-16"Hg. Downhills were 16-18" at 50 and up. There was no clear difference having the advance connected or not. The engine ran cooler on the second 2 legs but the air was cooler so that's probably why.
I still can't believe that adding/removing 24 degrees of advance isn't making a clearer difference, but what is clear is that I have a problem. I know my brakes aren't dragging. It's hard to imagine even bad alignment hurting efficiency to the tune of 50%. I pulled a few spark plugs and they were definitely not sooty. The insulators were pink. I am of the understanding that comes from additives in some premium fuels though--right?
|
|
By Pete 55Tbird - 11 Years Ago
|
Since you have such bad gas mileage and your vacuum reading are so low. Can you review a few things first?What rear axle ratio do you have? At 60 MPH what engine RPM do you see? At idle with transmission in neutral AND Distributor advance NOT CONNECTED what is the highest MANIFOLD vacuum reading you can obtain by advancing the distributor? Now what ignition advance do you see? There are lots of videos on using a vacuum gage on you tube that might be of interest. I can not understand why you do not see a very high vacuum reading ( 25 or higher ) on coast down in drive coming downhill. Is your gage good and hooked to a true manifold source? And of how good is the compression? Are you hauling anything in the trunk? Pete
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Pete,
The rear axle is 3.10:1. At 60 mph, my tach reads right around 2500 rpm. I will have to try the maximum advance thing tomorrow but right now at 9 degrees initial and about 550 rpm vacuum is 19.75". My gauge is connected to true manifold vacuum (the line that goes to the vacuum booster on the fuel pump from the intake). Also, when I coast downhill vacuum spikes up to about 24-25". I don't think I've ever seen it go above 25. The 16-18" on downhills I mentioned was for downhills shallow enough that it's still necessary to keep on the gas to maintain speed, like the sort you experience on the interstate in the piedmont, not the mountains. There is quite a bit of engine braking, or perhaps drag of another kind; the car certainly decelerates a lot faster than my '93 Buick Century when you let off the gas. I have always attributed that just to the 3.10 axle and 1:1 top gear. Now I'm wondering if it's something else. Compression is good, all cyls around 160 psi. Not enough in the trunk to matter! The tires are 225/70R14 on the stock rims though. Tread is wider than the rim itself. Perhaps that's a factor.
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
56 Roger, Yes, I checked it when I had the heads off and more than once since, they're correct within 2-3 degrees.
Pete, I did as you asked about what timing at idle with the vac adv disconnected gave the highest vacuum. Maximum vacuum at idling speed was about 21.5" and it occurred at about 28 degrees BTDC. There was an obvious increase of vacuum and engine speed as I moved the timing up from 9 to about 22; from 22 to 28 the change was much less noticeable but still present. Beyond 28 the vacuum was still strong but started to be a little less steady.
That seems like more advance at idle speed than the engine should be able to tolerate. Really not sure why it likes that much.
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Just to be sure, I checked my timing marks again. Stuck my pinky in the #1 spark plug hole and the marks are definitely still accurate.
I did as you said and drove around with the initial set to 25 degrees. I left the vacuum advance disconnected because the engine didn't like it. Wow, what a difference! Not only were the manifold vacuum readings obviously and consistently higher than before, but the engine felt much more lively, moreso than I would've guessed. I floored it a couple times and there was a little spark knock when the secondaries opened but it felt like it was just past the threshold of knocking vs. not knocking. Too early to tell whether fuel economy has improved but I expect it will as the average vacuum reading is up by at least 2 points. Still appears to be moving through the gas pretty quickly though.
So, I'm curious as to why my engine is wanting so much advance. Given good, even compression, good ignition components set correctly, a stock, correctly jetted carburetor, no performance mods, etc, it just doesn't make sense to me. True, the Fel-Pro permatorque head gaskets will have dropped the compression ratio a little. I just have never heard of a stock, street-type engine needing that much advance.
Any ideas?
|
|
By Ted - 11 Years Ago
|
|
peeeot (6/10/2014) So, I'm curious as to why my engine is wanting so much advance. Given good, even compression, good ignition components set correctly, a stock, correctly jetted carburetor, no performance mods, etc, it just doesn't make sense to me. True, the Fel-Pro permatorque head gaskets will have dropped the compression ratio a little. I just have never heard of a stock, street-type engine needing that much advance.
Any ideas?Are you using a dial back timing light? I have found some of these to have the wrong scaling on the knob which in turn gives erroneous readings. Beyond that, what kind of total timing numbers are you getting with the vacuum advance disconnected? If the distributor has a very short ignition curve, then the engine would like a higher initial timing setting for overall driving. Poor quality of fuel would also be another consideration.
|
|
By Talkwrench - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Did I miss what sort of carby you had? I don't think you have anything going on abnormal.. But you have a 57 , auto, its a big car, how much does one of those weight?
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
Ted, I'm not using a dial-back light. I measured the scale on the damper and marked out an extended scale up to 50 degrees. As for total timing, the most I specifically observed was 35 degrees mechanical. That was with 9 initial. I don't know the rpm I saw that at because the tach I was using to map advance points maxed out at 2000 rpm. Once both springs came into play around 1200 rpm the advance rate was very flat, so I expect there was more advance left in the distributor, but how much exactly I don't know as I didn't want to overrev the engine. In taking the initial up to 25, that would bring my total advance to 51. It is an original distributor, not the service-replacement later style with the triangular shaft. I seem to recall reading something about these dists. having a pretty high limit as far as advance range. Poor quality fuel is a possibility. All the pumps in central NC "may contain up to 10% ethanol." I prefer to use Shell or Exxon though I will fill up with others if convenience dictates.
Roger, no offense taken, sometimes with things like this it's hard to be satisfied unless one runs the tests oneself. Especially when the results are wonky. I think that rather than sending the unit off to be calibrated on a machine, I'm just going to calibrate it on the vehicle. Apparently my engine has "special needs," doubt I could anticipate them well enough to get the curve right without road testing.
Talkwrench, it's a 1957 Carter AFB with vacuum secondaries. Correct model number for 1957 312 Fairlane. I even verified all the jets and rods and such with a '57 Carter data sheet. Car should weigh about 3500 lbs according to specs I've found. Nothing too extreme.
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
I understand a bit better now why the prevailing wisdom calls for 36-38* mechanical advance in by 2500 + 6-8* vacuum advance. I used my vacuum gauge and timing light and tachometer and mapped the maximum vacuum in increments from idle up to 2500 RPM, and at what advance range that maximum was attained. From 1500 RPM up, the engine was happiest (about 23"Hg) right around 45*. Anywhere from 40-50* seemed about the same as far as vacuum, engine speed, and smoothness but I thought it sorta peaked in the middle of that range. Below 1500, it wanted 35-40* as low as 900 rpm.
I drove a quarter tank of mixed highway/suburban driving with the distributor set to 25 initial as described before. It feels better and more responsive all the time, but I still only managed 8.2 mpg. There must be excessive rolling resistance, that's the only thing that makes sense at this point. I'm going to replace the air filter too though I don't think there's anything wrong with the one on it.
|
|
By Talkwrench - 11 Years Ago
|
Peeeot , How can you be setting it with a 25 initial? With anything other than a modified timing plate set with 12 degrees in it, it would have be detonating badly, moreso if in by 2500! ? DO you have a good 10 or 20 X magnifying glass with a light to check you plugs for detonation? Im not really sure of your fuel over there but I just checked my settings the other day, because we where discussing this. I have [with a modified timing plate] 13 degrees initial , total timing at 38 degrees [that surprised me ; o P ] all in by 2750 rpm and with vacuum 50 degrees total. Pertronix ignitor 3 and matching coil, Car runs on the rich side, has a PCV, motor would be worn.. When on the freeway I had to stick my foot into it [not to the floor] and I heard a little detonation with that, maybe there's a mechanical / vacuum crossover? Some plugs did have one or two dots , nothing major I might knock 1 degree off and see how that goes. Vacuum is around 19- 20 out of gear idle, in 16-17, general cruising around 18 knock 2 off that for higher freeway speeds.
those figures you quoting are standing still with no load on it , Im sure it would change with driving.
|
|
By charliemccraney - 11 Years Ago
|
Initial timing has nothing to do with the internal advance mechanism (I'm assuming that is the timing plate) and you can set it to whatever you want so long as the engine starts and runs properly. 25 degrees is not very realistic, but it is possible. My thought is that it's not actually 25 degrees and something else is going on to make it appear so. Maybe that is with the vacuum advance connected?
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Charlie, that 25 degree initial is with the vacuum advance disconnected. I assure you that the timing marks are accurate. I have used different timing lights as well so it isn't instrument error either.
|
|
By Pete 55Tbird - 11 Years Ago
|
|
peeeot
I agree with Charlie that an engine with normal compression ( 120 psi or higher ) will be almost impossible to start with 25 degrees BTDC. It will kick back cold and not turn over with the starter when hot. Either your firing order of the sparkplug wires is off one plug or your camshaft is flat or the overlap ( intake valve open while the exhaust valve is open ) is excessive.
Something is wrong with this picture. Pete
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Pete, I agree that something is wrong with the picture. I'm hoping with the help of this forum I'll be able to find out what that is.
I'll double check my firing order first thing tomorrow. I know for certain that all cylinders are over 150psi compression so that's not the problem. The camshaft will be harder to check. I do know that my vacuum gauge always reads very smooth and steady and that engine power and responsiveness are good. I didn't observe any red flags when I had the cam out but I didn't measure every lobe either.
One unusual notion that occurred to me is, what if I had some exhaust leakage into my intake stream? Could that account for the symptoms?
|
|
By peeeot - 11 Years Ago
|
|
Checked firing order, distributor positioning, and TDC marks (again) and everything was as it should be. I think I may have at least a partial explanation though.
My statement about 25* "initial" was based on the mark I saw with my timing light at engine idle speed. This morning I checked the timing while cranking and observed a number more like 18*. THAT must be my true initial. Either the first spring is very soft or broken or it isn't under tension at rest, as I wouldn't expect to see any advance at 600 rpm but apparently I had some. I exercised the rotor with the cap off to make sure it always returned to the fully retarded position, which it did.
Regardless, 18 initial still seems like a lot for a stock engine to be happy with.
|
|
By charliemccraney - 11 Years Ago
|
It is time to evaluate and possibly rebuild the distributor. It is possible that the 18 degrees you observe is not initial but it is much more believable. You've identified a problem. Fix it and see if your initial advance becomes more realistic and mileage increases.
|
|