Marvel Mystery Oil


http://209.208.111.198/Topic17367.aspx
Print Topic | Close Window

By Joe Johnston - 17 Years Ago
Anyone have any opinion about using MMO in the gas and oil to help eliminate sticking valves?  (Read the posts folloing Unibodyguy's previous question.)   Joe
By ejstith - 17 Years Ago
When 100LL fuel first came out for airplane engines we had a problem with sticking valves in a Lycoming 360 engine in our helicopters. Our mechanic was a huge fan of MMO and used it a lot. It seemed to fix that problem. I have also seen engines that would barely or not at all pass a compression test and if the cylinder was filled with MMO and let sit a period of time and checked it would normally raise the compression enough to pass the test.
By Ted - 17 Years Ago
I don’t believe Marvel Mystery Oil is going to be cure all for sticking valves for engines that have been sitting.  It does potentially help for those engines that are already up and running though.  When the engines are set up for a period of time, then what little residual oil is remaining on the valves is wiped out by time, gravity, and any condensation forces that are at work.  For equipment that’s being set up for the winter, it’s typically recommended to pour a lite weight oil down the intake or carburetor while it’s running and let the engine die with this flood of oil in it.  There are also some aerosol foggers on the market for doing this.  The following spring, simply pull the plugs, put a light spin on the engine, then replace the plugs and restart the engine.  Many of the older farm engines have a port on the intake that can be removed specifically for pouring oil into for just this purpose.
By YukonCor55 - 17 Years Ago
I add 2 oz of MMO to every 5 gallons of gas for both of my 55's.  I also use it in my Indian Chief.  I can't say it prevents problems but I've never had a valve related issue yet.  Then again, I could just be plain lucky!  To me it's inexpesive "peace of mind!"

AJ 

By John F - 17 Years Ago
I've used it on stiking valves with success. I run it through the carb, then add to the fuel. Like Ted says it's not a cure all but it will help.
By mctim64 - 17 Years Ago
I've said it before that I like the stuff (MMO) I've used it in the oil and in the fuel. I don't know if the MMO is to be given credit, but I had a '88 Ford Ranger that had 365,000 mile on it when I sold it and I still see it around town. Also my dad used it and he had over 400,000 on a '75 Courier. It's great for air tools also.Smile

Tim

By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
This is one of those "Old Wives Tails" where some think MMO does something.......well.....because it's a "mystery"!

My dad used it and thought it did something because.......well, "I used it for 30 years and never had a problem"

I don't know why some think that an oil based liquid poured into gasoline helps the engine but there's a lot of people doing it.

I have owned a 1947 Stinson for 27 years that has a Franklin engine in it and have heard from many Stinson owners that MMO is akin to "Magic" stuff!! (I have NEVER put MMO in the oil or gas.....EVER......and NEVER will!)

Fact is, it's just a light mineral oil mixed with a (Stoddard) solvent.

I don't want to step on anyone's toes but it's pretty risky to put it in any FAA certified engine and then admit to running it because the FAA WILL absolutely take action against ANYONE who they catch using it in fuel intentionally.

I found this in an NTSB report: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_id=20020916X01610&ntsbno=NYC02LA181&akey=1

Although the pilot and FAA inspector did not report the same fuel tank as containing the red colored fuel, both were in agreement that the one tank contained the red colored fuel.

The operator told the FAA inspector that the red color was from an additive placed in the fuel tank, at a rate of one quart for each refueling. Examination of the engine revealed low compression on all cylinders, ranging from 44/80 to 5/80. Air bypass was noted on all exhaust valves, and on two of the intake valves. The number two cylinder was removed, and evidence consistent with detonation was found on the surface of the piston, and on the valves.

According to the FAA inspector, the additive that was added to the fuel was Marvel Mystery Oil. An empty 1 gallon can of Marvel Mystery Oil was found in the operator's trash. Instructions found on the can stated that the correct ratio for mixing with fuel was 1 part additive to 100 parts fuel. The contents of Marvel Mystery Oil were 74 percent mineral oil, 25 percent stoddard solvent, and 1 percent lard.


In a high compression air-cooled aircraft engine detonation is more prevalent at high cyl head temps and low octane. ANY mineral oils added to high octane fuel will lower the octane......That includes solvents, diesel fuel, and kerosene. (This is a VERY common occurrence when a piston engine aircraft is mistakenly fueled with jet fuel......the engine fails due to SEVERE detonation as the kerosene hits the combustion chamber in higher concentrations usually during take off.)

Liquid cooled engines are less susceptible detonation because the combustion chamber temps are lower.



Snake oils like MMO and others are great for the people who sell them....I am skeptical of their benefits to people who use them.


Regards,




By mctim64 - 17 Years Ago
Well Rick,

You make a very strong argument, I ran MMO in a Cont. A-65 (a very low comp. engine) for a number of years and never had a problem.  But you give me something to ponder.

Tim

By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
Hi Tim,

I have talked to MANY Stinson and Bellanca owners and a LOT of them said they've run it in Franklins for MANY years......"with no problems"

I suppose that you could get away with it in a low compression engine. The A-65 was something like 7:1 compression ratio I think.........

By the way here's another article that also talks about valve sticking (and they also suggest to NOT use MMO)
http://www.sacskyranch.com/eng176.htm

I don't see the advantage of putting a Naptha/oil/lard/red-dye mixture in a gasoline engine...... and the FAA doesn't either. Not only do you run the risk of detonation but you also run the risk of plug fouling from the oil.

Alcor TCP is FAA approved and is (was) used to prevent lead fouling in low compression engines running leaded fuel. Notice from the MSDS below that they don't put oil in the additive.....it's just used to prevent the lead components from collecting on the plugs, valves etc, inside the combustion chamber (it doesn't claim to remove the lead deposits already there)

http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/stylespilotshop/TCP-MSDS.pdf

There is a HUGE amount of testimonial-evidence out there. For some reason a LOT of people think they need to put things in their engines that is not recommended by industry but are recommended by the people that sell them to "fix" a perceived problem.

The problem with testimonial "evidence" is that it is not really evidence at all......AND usually, folks don't consider the (much larger number of) people that don't use those "snake oils" and "never have a problem". (Excluding zddp additives of course)


Maybe all this stuff is not that relevant to our Y-block engines, but for fogging an engine for winter layup they DO have products that are specifically for that purpose and are used in marine and other engines every year. If I was going to do a winter layup I would probably use one of those instead of MMO.



Cheers,






By Ketterbros - 17 Years Ago
OK, I'am convinced, next trip to the drag strip, I recommend MMO to the scrub drivers..

Remember Henry Ford never drove a chevbie, But Louis Cheverolet drove Fords..

By Ol Ford Guy - 17 Years Ago
Hey Rick,

You must be a Hallicrafters man.  I wonder how many Y-Block guy's are hams?  Our web site host is and so am I.

de W9PJ

By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
Ol Ford Guy (10/14/2008)
Hey Rick,



You must be a Hallicrafters man. I wonder how many Y-Block guy's are hams? Our web site host is and so am I.



de W9PJ








You caught me!!



I have had this user name on 4 or 5 different sites Y-block, truck, Linux, GM Diesel, iBoats etc....



NO ONE has ever asked me what it means! I actually have an HT32B AND an SX115.!!



I always wanted them starting back in the 70's! The SX115 works and the HT32B needs attention. I also have an SR-400, a Drake C-line (bought it new) and some other newer ICOM stuff!





73/Rick








By mctim64 - 17 Years Ago
Thanks for all the info on the MMO,

I'm not a "Ham" but my father was since the thirties (W6MUV), He passed away last year at the nice old age of 88 and I was left with a bunch of his old equipment and magazines. I offered the to the Hams that came to his memorial but no body came to clame any of it. I would be willing to give it to the right person if they just come get it or pay for shipping.

I have decades of QST and ARRL mags back to the 40s atleast, and here are few pics of a few pieces.

By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
Tim,

I used to live in Taft.

I know there's a great group of hams around the Fresno/Visalia area that could hook you up.


Try contacting http://w6to.com/



Regards,


Rick

By mctim64 - 17 Years Ago
Rick,

I finally read the article at sacskyranch.com, very interesting, I recommend it to others even if they don't fly.

http://www.sacskyranch.com/eng176.htm

Tim

By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
Yeah,



If you look thru the SAC Skyranch site, there's a WHOLE bunch of other fairly interesting info there....



I looked at your site too.....That Chief ground loop video scared me for a moment w00t .......Your definition of a groundloop is not the same as mine!!
By mctim64 - 17 Years Ago
The "Groundloop" is a joke, it gets people to watch thinking they are going to see carnage. BigGrin

There are those that have and those that will.

Tim

By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
I had a Champ before the Stinson and only put about a thousand hours on it.... Got the Stinson in 1981 and (knock on wood) haven't GL'd it yet! Wink



Sure would like to have another Champ!


By mctim64 - 17 Years Ago
My Dad had a Champ from '55 to '70 and he was sure happy when I bought the Chief, it was my first tailwheel airplane and I groundlooped on my first flight (I figured I'd get it out of the way) I scraped a wingtip and ended up recovering the plane, it was a great expireance and my Dad and I got to do some bonding. I sold it in '95 and still miss it.

Tim

By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
My dad and I got our Champ flying in 1973. I used to fly it from Taft to FAT and take the city bus from FAT to CSUF for classes. After the last class I would take the bus back to FAT and fly it back to Taft. It was 1.5hr back to Taft. (6gallons of fuel)



A Champ is a great airplane! Chief too. I would take either now! I like the Stinson but it burns 10 gallons an hour. At $6/gallon it gets pretty expensive to go anywhere!


By Johnson Rod - 17 Years Ago
yummmaa! Am I still on the Y-Block site...
By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
Yeah.....it's just a little detour!!
By Johnson Rod - 17 Years Ago
Just kidding, don't let me interrupt your conversation. Even though I don't know what your talking about, I must have been interest enough to read the whole tread...
By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
Where in SOCAL are you?



Yeah, we should have probably did this using "PMs"



It's just an "after the main thread questions are answered" thing I guess!!


By Johnson Rod - 17 Years Ago
Rick,



I am in the South Bay Area, Redondo Beach to be specific.
By ejstith - 17 Years Ago
HT32BSX115 (10/14/2008)
This is one of those "Old Wives Tails" where some think MMO does something.......well.....because it's a "mystery"!



My dad used it and thought it did something because.......well, "I used it for 30 years and never had a problem"



I don't know why some think that an oil based liquid poured into gasoline helps the engine but there's a lot of people doing it.



I have owned a 1947 Stinson for 27 years that has a Franklin engine in it and have heard from many Stinson owners that MMO is akin to "Magic" stuff!! (I have NEVER put MMO in the oil or gas.....EVER......and NEVER will!)



Fact is, it's just a light mineral oil mixed with a (Stoddard) solvent.



I don't want to step on anyone's toes but it's pretty risky to put it in any FAA certified engine and then admit to running it because the FAA WILL absolutely take action against ANYONE who they catch using it in fuel intentionally.



I found this in an NTSB report: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_id=20020916X01610&ntsbno=NYC02LA181&akey=1



Although the pilot and FAA inspector did not report the same fuel tank as containing the red colored fuel, both were in agreement that the one tank contained the red colored fuel.



The operator told the FAA inspector that the red color was from an additive placed in the fuel tank, at a rate of one quart for each refueling. Examination of the engine revealed low compression on all cylinders, ranging from 44/80 to 5/80. Air bypass was noted on all exhaust valves, and on two of the intake valves. The number two cylinder was removed, and evidence consistent with detonation was found on the surface of the piston, and on the valves.



According to the FAA inspector, the additive that was added to the fuel was Marvel Mystery Oil. An empty 1 gallon can of Marvel Mystery Oil was found in the operator's trash. Instructions found on the can stated that the correct ratio for mixing with fuel was 1 part additive to 100 parts fuel. The contents of Marvel Mystery Oil were 74 percent mineral oil, 25 percent stoddard solvent, and 1 percent lard.





In a high compression air-cooled aircraft engine detonation is more prevalent at high cyl head temps and low octane. ANY mineral oils added to high octane fuel will lower the octane......That includes solvents, diesel fuel, and kerosene. (This is a VERY common occurrence when a piston engine aircraft is mistakenly fueled with jet fuel......the engine fails due to SEVERE detonation as the kerosene hits the combustion chamber in higher concentrations usually during take off.)



Liquid cooled engines are less susceptible detonation because the combustion chamber temps are lower.







Snake oils like MMO and others are great for the people who sell them....I am skeptical of their benefits to people who use them.





Regards,









Our mechanic never put it in the fuel. He put it in the oil. He's one of the highest regarded helicopter mechanics in the southeast. In 40 years he's never had any problem with the FAA.
By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
Our mechanic never put it in the fuel. He put it in the oil. He's one of the highest regarded helicopter mechanics in the southeast. In 40 years he's never had any problem with the FAA.





I would bet that he never told anyone at the FAA he did that. If he did they would probably suspend his license.



MMO is not an FAA approved additive for any fuel or oil for anything aviation. The FAA takes a very dim view of doing ANYTHING that is not approved and they usually take certificate action if they find out about it....
By ejstith - 17 Years Ago
HT32BSX115 (10/21/2008)
Our mechanic never put it in the fuel. He put it in the oil. He's one of the highest regarded helicopter mechanics in the southeast. In 40 years he's never had any problem with the FAA.





I would bet that he never told anyone at the FAA he did that. If he did they would probably suspend his license.



MMO is not an FAA approved additive for any fuel or oil for anything aviation. The FAA takes a very dim view of doing ANYTHING that is not approved and they usually take certificate action if they find out about it....




Well I don't know, I just fly 'em, I don't work on 'em .. I just know he did it and I flew it and I never had a problem.
By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
Well I don't know, I just fly 'em, I don't work on 'em .. I just know he did it and I flew it and I never had a problem.





That's very common. The difficulty comes from when a "problem" actually does happen. When the FAA discovers that the PIC "knows" of a discrepancy, yet continues to operate the aircraft, They can take action against the mechanic for using an "un-approved" device, fuel, oil, additive, etc which makes the aircraft un-airworthy, and then take action against the Pilot In Command for operating an aircraft in an "un-airworthy" condition.



It happens in the airline industry all the time. Mechanic makes a mistake in the maintenance logbook that renders the aircraft un-airworthy, and they hammer the mechanic and the pilot crew that subsequently flys the aircraft.





We have of course, sort of gotten off the original argument of whether MMO is "ok" for our Y-blocks I guess.....



To answer the original question. There's no actual evidence that MMO does anything except make the user feel good about his engine. .......(oh.....it increases profits for those who sell it!!)



There's a LOT of testimonial "evidence" that it doesn't "hurt" anything. [ My brother, uncle, dad, grandpa, Pet mechanic, friend, wife, husband etc etc etc used MMO, Slick-50, STP, and other "SNAKE-OILS" for many years and "They had no problems"]



Those reasons are not good enough for me.



I'll just keep using a good oil, and fuel. and do normal maintenance and drive my "Y" for many years.



I am worried about flat tappet camshaft wear. There's lots of industry info on that from camshaft grinders and manufacturers. I will follow their published advice.



Regards,





Rick






By Johnson Rod - 17 Years Ago
Rick,



I was just on Egge Machine web site ( http://www.egge.com/ ) and saw this link for Torco oils ( http://www.webrodder.com/article.php?AID=429&SID=4 ). I thought it might be of interest??
By Joe Johnston - 17 Years Ago
Thanks for all the input and the interesting diversion also.  Lots of experiences from many people.  I was hoping for some actual test results that someone had come across or more strongly opinionated answers, (pro and con), so I guess the conclusion is that it may help, and probably won't hurt.   I lean towards the "Snake Oyl" side, but I am using MMO in the oil and gas as recommended by my engine builder.   He seems to think it will help and it is a small price to pay.   The engine is freshly rebuilt but car is in the process of restoration and only gets started once a week and run for 20 - 30 min to warm up well.   Since using MMO I haven't had any additional stuck valves but this is the only engine I have ever used it in.   Thanks again for everyone's input.   J
By ejstith - 17 Years Ago
HT32BSX115 (10/22/2008)
Well I don't know, I just fly 'em, I don't work on 'em .. I just know he did it and I flew it and I never had a problem.





That's very common. The difficulty comes from when a "problem" actually does happen. When the FAA discovers that the PIC "knows" of a discrepancy, yet continues to operate the aircraft, They can take action against the mechanic for using an "un-approved" device, fuel, oil, additive, etc which makes the aircraft un-airworthy, and then take action against the Pilot In Command for operating an aircraft in an "un-airworthy" condition.



It happens in the airline industry all the time. Mechanic makes a mistake in the maintenance logbook that renders the aircraft un-airworthy, and they hammer the mechanic and the pilot crew that subsequently flys the aircraft.





We have of course, sort of gotten off the original argument of whether MMO is "ok" for our Y-blocks I guess.....



To answer the original question. There's no actual evidence that MMO does anything except make the user feel good about his engine. .......(oh.....it increases profits for those who sell it!!)



There's a LOT of testimonial "evidence" that it doesn't "hurt" anything. [ My brother, uncle, dad, grandpa, Pet mechanic, friend, wife, husband etc etc etc used MMO, Slick-50, STP, and other "SNAKE-OILS" for many years and "They had no problems"]



Those reasons are not good enough for me.



I'll just keep using a good oil, and fuel. and do normal maintenance and drive my "Y" for many years.



I am worried about flat tappet camshaft wear. There's lots of industry info on that from camshaft grinders and manufacturers. I will follow their published advice.



Regards,





Rick











Guess I just lucked out. I just retired from this flyin' game after 40 years and I escaped the wrath of the FAA .. whew .. !!
By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
You lucky dog!



I've been doing it since the early 70's and have 5 years to go (well I can retire in 5 years....thanks to Congress I can go another 5 after that!! Crying )......I'm keeping my fingers crossed though!!



I'd rather retire now and work on the old truck and fly the Stinson!!


By ejstith - 17 Years Ago
Well I wasn't quite ready to retire. Would have been next year but they had cut backs, sold a plane and said I had been doing this long enough. I guess I had a pretty good run. Only had basically 2 jobs, one for the City of Tampa Police Dept flying helicopters and then the last 22 for the State of Florida flying King Airs & Citation. I guess at 67 I'll just be a tripple dipper .. lol !! Keep the shiny side up .. ya hear ..