By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
So I've been out on the highway several times now. I tend to keep up with traffic at 1500 to 2000rpm. Around here people do about 80. I'm concerned that that may be too low for the engine. I hear no knocks or weird noises but it's hard to hear anything over the wind noise. In the other gears, 1500rpm feels like the start of the power band so lugging is the concern. I'm thinking I should gear it a little shorter to get into the 2000 to 2500 range. What do y'all think. The engine is 318ci, 9.5:1, cam 226 @ 50, 274 adv, 112 Separation, .295 lift.
|
By mctim64 - 17 Years Ago
|
I know I would like it to rev a little higher, mine with a 3.50:1 rear ratio and short tires turns 2500 @ 70 mph and feals real nice. I've got about the same spec engine as yours, it has real good low end torque, but I don't think I'd want to lug it all day. Tim
|
By kidcourier - 17 Years Ago
|
Tim ,what's the overall height of your rear tires 25"-26"? Charlie, maybe you or a friend might have a set of tires the height of Charlies that you could try at 70mph to see what RPM your turning? If it's a comfortable rpm for the motor then stay with the tire size or go lower gears in the rear end. I know you have already thought of this but I've already done ebay,sooo! Any way my 94 flareside runs 31"s and an aode with 3:73's cruises all day at 70 mph. KID
|
By Ted - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie. Any idea what gear ratio is in the truck now? Ideally, a mininum cruise rpm of 2000-2250 would be ideal but as Kid mentions, tire diameter is a key player here.
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
It should be a 3.70. It hasn't been verified, though. I can't read the tag on the axle housing. Tires are 225/70-15 which work out to about 27.4" tall.
|
By mctim64 - 17 Years Ago
|
kidcourier (11/2/2008) Tim ,what's the overall height of your rear tires 25"-26"? Charlie, maybe you or a friend might have a set of tires the height of Charlies that you could try at 70mph to see what RPM your turning? If it's a comfortable rpm for the motor then stay with the tire size or go lower gears in the rear end. I know you have already thought of this but I've already done ebay,sooo! Any way my 94 flareside runs 31"s and an aode with 3:73's cruises all day at 70 mph. KIDThe tires I run on the truck now are 26" tall, when I put my camper on the 6 ply tires I have for the extra load are 29" tall and I still get a comfortable cruise. With the taller tires my speedo dosen't read correctly, but I indicate 60 and the RPM is still the same. Also on the funny side, the old "Alaskan" is a heavy load, but with the taller tires I seem to get the same mileage as I do unloaded. 
|
By speedpro56 - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie, if you can cruise 70 mph at 2000 + rpms and not lugging ( rocking back and forth ) with the engine feeling like it's in its power band then I feel you're good to go with the cam you're using, and your gear ratio sounds about right on.
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
I would like 2000rpm minimum when cruising. So I guess first thing I need to do is to check the final drive ratio. Then find out how fast I'm going at a given RPM and start doing some math. The speedo's been reading fast since the trans swap. The drive gear in the tranny must be bigger.
|
By miker - 17 Years Ago
|
It's not a cure all, but I like to put a vacumn gauge on and see what I'm pulling at cruise, compared to idle, one gear lower etc. If nothing else, it'll tell you how close you are to opening the power valve (or step up rod, or whatever the carb has) 'cause that really kills the mileage. Learned that in a motor home on a day with a headwind.
|
By Ted - 17 Years Ago
|
Miker is dead on in his comments on the engine vacuum. I had a 352 in a pickup in which I had changed the gearing from 3.89 to 3.00 and the fuel mileage took a dump. I did have a permanently mounted vacuum gauge on that pickup and it told the story as the vacuum also took a dump at the cruising rpm. Put the 3.89’s back in and the fuel mileage went back up accordingly.
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
I made the trip to Orlando yesterday. I got a whopping 13.12 miles per gallon! That's a good as I get without overdrive! I guess I'll take a look at the vacuum at cruising RPM when I get back. I was hoping for at least 15 but expecting around 18. I didn't have single problem on the way. Hopefuly my curse of not making it out of Georgia is finnished. There's this one spot just north of Ocala where it's just flat for about 2 miles. Traffic was heavy but I imagined what it must be like to be Charlie at Bonneville. If the traffic wasn't so heavy I may not have been imagining so much!
|
By pcmenten - 17 Years Ago
|
BTW, where did you get a cam with 112 of LSA? That's not a typical Y-block LSA number.
|
By pintoplumber - 17 Years Ago
|
Way to go Charlie, it's nine months till Columbus - when do you think you should leave?
|
By pegleg - 17 Years Ago
|
miker (11/3/2008) It's not a cure all, but I like to put a vacumn gauge on and see what I'm pulling at cruise, compared to idle, one gear lower etc. If nothing else, it'll tell you how close you are to opening the power valve (or step up rod, or whatever the carb has) 'cause that really kills the mileage. Learned that in a motor home on a day with a headwind. Some of the Motor homes I've been driving lately to make a buck seem to get the same mileage in direct (3rd) into a head wind as they do in 4th direct (OD). These are fuel injected. The carb version should be moreso. They all seem to be happiest around 2000 to 2300. as Ted said.
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
The cam is a grind sold by Mummert years ago as the repro F-code cam. I think it's been determined since that it's not the F-code grind. It's a good cam. Sounds nice at idle. Not the best choice for a truck that will do truck work, though. If I leave next week I think it will make it to Columbus  I have a lot planned for the truck this year. But unlike last year, with the floor pan and all, it will be mostly familiar territory. 3 major projects. One will be done before May.
|
By MoonShadow - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie, what was your cruising RPM on the trip? What is your current rear end ratio? My Van has a 3.90 rear axle and AOD. When I pull my travel trailer in overdrive on a flat road my fuel mileage gets worse. The RPM range is a bit too high (?) and it make the engine work too hard to maintain the speed. Dropping out of overdrive increases the mileage. I think if I had a 4.11 gear the overdrive might work ok. If you RPM is too low you need to shift down a gear or change the rear axle. Chuck in NH
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
During this trip I was at about 2000rpm most of the way. I feel like it's definitely turning too slow for the engine's power band. The final drive ratio is an unconfirmed 3.70. I'm going to see what's available for overdrive ratios for the tranny. I'd like not to get it out of a rear end change as that will affect city driving as well.
|
By pegleg - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie, Maybe, maybe not. You'll shift up more quickly but I suspect the in town mileage would be unaffected.
|
By MoonShadow - 17 Years Ago
|
Whats the highway RPM in 4th gear? Chuck in NH
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
I didn't look during the trip. When I made the trip several years ago, with the 3 speed, I think it was 3500ish. When I attempted to make it to Columbus 2 years ago it seemed about the same to keep up with traffic. I'd say definitely between 3500 and 4000 in 4th. I'll take a look on the way back. That about works out with the 37% overdrive. I'll do some expirimenting with smaller tires before I decide which way I'll go on gearing. If city milage is not affected then I will not hesitate to go shorter in the rear. The axle is the next and last thing in the driveline to get attention.
|
By pcmenten - 17 Years Ago
|
I wonder if your carb needs tuning, not your gear ratio. As someone mentioned, it might be that the power valve is opening.
I have an 86 Mustang GT with the 5 speed and its rear gear is 2.8 or so. It gets over 25 MPG if I cruise at 65 mph with the back window down in 5th gear. It's turning right around 2000 IIRC.
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
The carb could very well need a different step up spring for cruising. I'll find that out with the vacuum gauge. I have a feeling it has to do mostly with gearing. I have an 88 firebird 5.0 which will get 30mpg on a good day. It will cruise at about 1800rpm. The two engines are built considerably differently, though (besides the obvious difference in the manufacturer). My firebird is stock and torquey right off idle. My Y is more performance oriented and doesn't really start pulling until around 1500 - 2000 rpm or so. This means that in overdrive I may not be in the power band which isn't really ideal for fuel economy.
|
By Unibodyguy - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie, if you do know what the number, way to I.D. the cam and the specs on it, cam card, maybe John in CA could tell you what the sweet spot or power range would be on it to gear it accordingly. Also too, you can go to Richmond Gears website use their strret calculator and figure what your RPM's would be at 70 mph, as an example. A friend of mine used here in Vegas and had great reults when regearing his truck, gained about 2-3 mpg when he did this. Michael
|
By Carson - 17 Years Ago
|
Tip.. check rear end gear ratio by lifting the rear end mark the a rear tire/wheel and drive shaft rotate the tire/wheel one full turn and count the rotation turns of the drive shaft cheers
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
I'll do that. Just have to wait for a relatively warm day.
|
By 57FordPU - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie, Sorry, here comes the math teacher. Using the one tire rotation method is a good one. It does require you to estimate the last rotation of the drive shaft, but would probably get you close enough to determine if you have one of the standard ratios. If you are anyone reading would like to be exactly sure, it would take two people and perhaps 10 minutes. Turn the tire 100 times and the number of drive shaft turns would be the exact numbers in the ring and pinion ratio. So, 350 drive shaft turns would be a 3.50 ratio. If 100 seems to many, turn the tire 50 times and multiply the drive shaft turns by 2 (25 tire turns, multiply by 4, 10 turns, multiply by 10). This is the method I use in selecting the closest ratio transmission possible for the tiny-Y. I put vice grips on the input and output shafts and turn the input shaft 100 times in each gear while my wife (crew chief) counts the number of tail shaft turns. (Using math is too tough!) By the way, when you get around to doing the math with different tire diameters, don't forget the overdrive in calculating the final drive ratio. It will require you to know the exact ratio in the overdrive. I put together an Excell program to calculate speed with given rpm, rear ratios, and tire diameters. I would do the math on it for you, but it is specific for a 1:1 drive through the trans. I am changing to a T-5 myself this winter. If 4th gear is not 1:1, I will have to change my little program and then I can do the math for you. If the transmission ID tag is still on the trans I have a reference chart to tell you the exact overdrive ratio. Hope this helps.....................
|
By Ted - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie. Don’t recall which carb you are running but that in itself can be a big player when dealing with fuel economy issues. On some carb models, I find it necessary to enlarge the PVCR (power valve channel restriction) while decreasing the primary jet size. This allows the same amount of fuel at full throttle but permits the engine to use less fuel under cruise situations. With a leaner fuel mixture, the engine will prefer an increase in ignition timing though. And while on the subject of ignition timing, this is also another area worth exploring as the Y’s do tend to like more timing at cruise than is normally being supplied. Fuel quality from station to station also varies. I find it increasingly difficult as time goes on to maintain a consistency in fuel mileage even when getting the fuel at the same station. As an additional note, gasoline with an actual 10% added ethanol will get a reduced mileage over pure gasoline (no ethanol) but without testing each load of fuel beforehand, it’s difficult to know exactly what is going into the fuel tank. I sometimes wonder if the ethanol itself stays adequately mixed in the gasoline or if some separation takes place over time in the storage tanks which in turn changes the amounts getting to a vehicles fuel tank. As far as rear end gearing changes go, it’s typically the most cost effective change that can be made when working with the mechanicals. If a ready to go additional third member is already set up, then the actual third member change in the vehicle only takes an hour.
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
It is an Edelbrock carb. If it is the cause, it seems almost like I'll need two tunes. The cruise and power modes are tuned well for city driving. Timing hasn't been optimized, though. I'm not going to get too caught up on the carb. I plan to get rid of it this year, anyway. I was actually thinking about taking a piece of masking tape, marking it every 10 degrees for the circumference of the driveshaft, using a magnet to hold a pointer and use that to figure out the ratio. That way I can translate the number of degrees of rotation into the precise number of turns it made for one turn of the wheel. For instance, the difference between 3.70 and 3.89 is 68.4 degrees. That will be easy to distinguish with 10 degree graduations.
|
By 57FordPU - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie, I like your idea, and I agree with the math. Perhaps the most gratifying is that it is creative and possibly an original thought. Keep in mind that for every one degree error in one rotation of the tire, it will effect the drive shaft rotation approximately 4 degrees. Good luck..........................
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
Thank you. Good point, so then I will make a mark and put a pointer on the tire as well. Well, I got some more data on the way back. For the first tank of gas I did not use overdrive. I got 13.33mpg. I was trying to keep it at 3500rpm, doing about 80 keeping up with traffic. For the second tank I did use overdrive and tried to keep it around 2200rpm which was also about 80. I got 14.28mpg. I forgot to mark mileage and gallons used for the rest of the trip. A friend suggested that I get on the interstate, use 4th gear and drive at 2000rpm, check mileage, then 2500rpm, check mileage, then 3000rpm and so on and so forth, to find the most efficient rpm. Then I know where my cruising rpm will have to be. It sounds logical to me. What do y'all think?
|
By GREENBIRD56 - 17 Years Ago
|
Charlie - Just remember the aero resistance is based on the speed squared - slowing down 10 mph makes a big diff in req'd torque/horsepower (fuel consumption). The headwind or tailwind can really get in there and cause some mischief if you are trying to figure this out while driving.
|
By HT32BSX115 - 17 Years Ago
|
Howdy all I'm in the same boat as everyone else I guess....(well maybe its a BARGE!!)
I have a final axle ratio of 5.83:1 and the transmission OD will be 0.71 (E4OD) but I have approx 40" tires! 
I am figuring approx 2050 rpm at 60 mph in top gear.. (TC locked) ......... I think that'll be a perfect Y-Block RPM for an empty, flat road cruise.
I'll probably have to tweak the throttle position sensor to drop out of locked TC/OD at the "right" throttle position though...
Regards,
|
By charliemccraney - 17 Years Ago
|
That is a good point about the wind resistance. Trying different diameter tires will probably be best to find the sweet spot.
|