intake manifold gap at the ports


http://209.208.111.198/Topic23362.aspx
Print Topic | Close Window

By Jim Rowe - 16 Years Ago
I have just put the heads on my 312. The heads had been milled and the block has been decked to make it square with the crank. It appears the intake has a gap of .025 at the lower lip of the bottom ports without a gasket in place. The gasket is a Fel-Pro and measures .065-.066. Will I be able to tighten this manifold down and not have a leak?



The heads were milled .043 they are 113's, ported and with BIG Pontiac valves. The manifold is an "E" code aluminum, not perfect it has been welded on the bottom in the heat riser area.



Let me know your thoughts.... I know I can have the heads milled in the port area. Or I can have the manifold milled. OR.. does anyone make a thicker intake gasket with the larger ports for these heads that might work as they are?



Jim
By 46yblock - 16 Years Ago
With the manifold and gasket in place but not bolted down, look into several of the manifold bolt holes with a flashlight and see how they line up with the threaded holes in head.  It sounds like the centers of the manifold holes should be well above head centers.  Significant net loss from block and heads can make additional milling required on head intake flanges.  Figure net loss by totalling head and deck loss and subtracting .020 if using a comp. gasket. 

So say there is .025 off head and .022 off deck, subtract .020 and net loss is .027.  Given the angle of the intake mount flange, supposedly the amount it needs to be reduced would be .027 X 1.4, or .039.  Having just done this to my heads, using the factor, the manifold was a little lower than perfect, and if doing it all again I would use a slightly lower number than what the multiplier gives.

Rather than mill the intake flange of the heads you could do the manifold, but like guys on here told me the manifold is slaved to that engine only, and should you want to put on a diff. manifold in future it wouldnt fit.

By 46yblock - 16 Years Ago
Adding to the previous post:  I had .046 taken off the intake flanges.  It completely removed the top portion of the flange and some of the cast high points between flange and rocker cover pedestal.  More than .046 will begin to thin the rocker cover pad.