T-Bird front springs


http://209.208.111.198/Topic33735.aspx
Print Topic | Close Window

By TriggerTorqueDave - 16 Years Ago
I am doing a frame up on my overdrive 1957 T-Bird (E-model) which will be street driven. I want to improve handling and am trying to find a source for front coil springs with a higher spring rate than the stock 290 #'s per inch. ( I have front & rear heavy duty anti-sway bars) I have found 1956 Ford springs with 420 lbs/inch but that might be too harsh?? David C.
By BIGREDTODD - 16 Years Ago
I haven't modified the springs on my 'Bird (yet:heheSmile ) but I have on my F-100 and others...

It has been my experience that aspect ratio on the tires/wheels makes a bigger difference with the "harsh" feel than the actual springs. If you are doing aa frame-off on an E-Bird, I imagine you are planning on keeping a fairly stock appearance, with 70 or 75 series 14 or 15" tires.

Given that assumption, I would not expect the heavier springs you note above to be too bad, although certainly a noticable difference. With the higher spring rate, though, you will likely need to remove a partial or full coil (given that the static heights are the same) to maintain the "stock" ride height.

I would go for it. I was shocked how well my '56 handled with the rag (bias ply) tires that it currently has. I can certainly understand why people liked to race these cars...

Done rambling now...others may have a different view, this has been my experience.

BIGREDTODD

By Pete 55Tbird - 16 Years Ago
Dave

I replaced the front springs on my 55 Tbird heavier springs. I do not recall the lbs/inch rating but I believe they are 450 lbs/inch. I did not cut them and with the 215/70 15 inch radials the front fender wheel arch is just under 27 inch off the ground. The springs are made of .618 inch wire. I have front and rear sway bars and KYB gas shocks. The ride is not harsh or choppy.

The 57 Ford shop manual list the 57 Tbird springs as free height of 14.99inch.

I put 620 lb front springs in a 66 Shelby GT350 that had factory springs ( 480 lbs?) and that was an acceptable ride also. If your cars front end was as worn as mine was before the rebuild, that alone will make a whole world of difference. Pete

By speedpro56 - 16 Years Ago
David, I put heavier 56 ford springs on my 56 tbird and THEY DID NOT WORK, my front end was sooooo stiff that the bird wouldn't lean enough in front to bite in a curve and made it more dangerous to drive on these curvy roads here in Asheville. Put the original springs back on the front with a one inch aluminium spacer in the top where they can't be seen and just by adding a rear sway bar the bird drives beautiful. I tried a heavier station wagon front sway bar and found that to be abit too much, put the original back on and figured out ford worked out most of the details more than I realized. So what I found for me to be the biggest benefit on handling was the simple addition of the rear sway bar and heavy duty gas shocks. The only reason I put the spacers on top of my front springs was to lift the bird slightly in front because of my 16 inch wheels over my disk brakes and still have enough give for a good ride.
By TriggerTorqueDave - 16 Years Ago
Gary, Pete & Todd- Thanks for the info! I was able to find a vendor who made a T-Bird spring with 360 lbs. per inch, which is about 25 % stiffer than stock. Hopefully this will be a good compromise. David C.
By Noob - 16 Years Ago
Please post back with impressions/results... I too am considering stiffer springs.  I'm considering a source that can custom make a progressive rate spring that could also be shorter for a 1-2" lower stance in the front.

Cheers... Brian

PS: Is a 7/8" sway bar sufficient or would 1-1/8" be a better choice?

By PF Arcand - 16 Years Ago
Noob: Are you referring to the front or rear?..
By Noob - 16 Years Ago
Regarding the sway bar, I'm inquiring about either the front and rear, thou typically I've understood the front should be stiffer than the rear bar so as to prevent oversteer.

Cheers... Brian

By speedpro56 - 16 Years Ago
Read my post above on my experience with the front heavier station wagon sway bar versus the original sway bar on my 56 tbird with a rear sway bar being used. Using the rear sway bar was all that was needed with the original front bar supplied by Ford. When I installed the wagon front bar everything was just too stiff with no lean in a curve which caused the front end to lose it's grip because the tires just couldn't get enough bit for traction. You get to experience alot of that here in the mountains of Asheville, N.C. This is only my experience, it may be different with others on the forum.
By rhiggins77 - 15 Years Ago
Where did you get front/rear sway bar?



Thanks
By GREENBIRD56 - 15 Years Ago
T_T_Dave - What tire are you going to run? About 75% of what you are looking for is tire related. The rest is in the A-arm positions. When these are right - a pretty wide range of spring rates will work.

To handle well in a corner - the A-arms will have to assume a position that holds the outer tire upright (squares the tread to the pavement). So the outer spring deflection (upon weight transfer) has to result in a movement of the arms that complements the body roll and leaves the tire in the proper position. Ideally - the lower arm should be dead-on horizontal so the hinge point and knuckle (ball joint) on the upright are in a straight line at normal ride height and wheels aimed dead ahead. As the body rolls, the upper A-arm should rotate to move the upper end of the upright to just the right angle to complement the body roll. Getting this just right ain't too easy with a 55's set of suspension hangers.   

If the set-up had no springs (sollid bars) and the tires were locked upright - the car could exert considerable handling side force - but the ride would be terrible. Height of the C.G. would then limit the speed (gross side load) the car could tolerate before it slipped sideways (or flopped over). This is one of the reasons it always "feels better" right away when guys lower their cars with cut coils - springs get stiffer / C.G. goes down.  

Lowering the C.G. with no change of stock A-arm position will give you better handling without increasing spring rate or changing the ride. The most straight-forward way - is a lower aspect ratio tire - C.G. goes right down, tread gets wider (more grip), ride remains the same. There is a limit to this - the tire sidewall is a "spring" - and going to a rubber band on 22 inch rims doesn't get it done...... Second choice - use an upright with a revised spindle position - the Granada or Versailles disc brake mods get a 1 inch+ C.G. drop with no spring or tire change. Add a low aspect tire to this and the C.G. will be right down there....with the original T-bird ride.