Counter-intuitive...?


http://209.208.111.198/Topic53088.aspx
Print Topic | Close Window

By joey - 15 Years Ago
Hello gentlemen,

Apologize up front for the long post, but I want to give full background: 56 TBird with 312 Yblock, ported ECZC heads, ECZ 9425 B intake, mild cam (275/.423") dual-point Mallory YH with dwell at 32, stock exhaust, initial ignition timed at 14 BTDC with mechanical advance at 24, all advance in by about 2500 RPM. I burn only 93 octane with 4 oz. of Marvel added to every 10 gals.

A couple years ago I installed a BG Speed Demon 575 cfm carb. The carb is seated properly. The pump shooter is #31 with orange cam set at #1 hole; accelerator pump is set carefully so that it reacts immediately. The idle speed restrictors were originally 31s, I went down to 27s to offset a too-high idle. The primary jets are #60s (down from the #62s it came with) and the secondaries are #72s. Float settings are exactly to the middle of the sight glass. In the past I closed the Idle Eze under the air cleaner stud off completely to simplify tuning variables for myself, and ended up leaving it closed off. I've had the carb out recently to make sure everything was clean, gaskets aligned, etc., and to make sure the primary throttle blades are set so that the exposed transfer slot shows as a little square as suggested. The secondary throttle butterflies are set to the bottom of the transfer slot. A brand new PCV valve is located between the hole on the valley pan to the port on the back of the carb. There is no trace of fuel leaks anywhere. In the past I've checked and re-checked for vacuum leaks and there are none. In line fuel pressure gauge shows steady delivery of gas.

Barry Grant literature  suggests that the four idle mix screws be set between 1 and 2-1/2 turns out. (When screws are bottomed out, engine does quit). The idle mix screws are set at exactly 1 turn out only; yet my exhaust shows sooty black residue and the plugs are black-carbony. Rich, right? Not sure why it's so rich at only 1 turn out...but Demons like it rich. Let's leave that be for right now.

Here's the thing. The engine idles fine at 650-700 rpm and basically runs strong, but under gradual acceleration there is a s-l-i-g-h-t hesitation until the secondaries kick in.

When you slightly choke it manually at normal running temp (giving it more fuel) the hesitation goes away. One might think on the surface that maybe I should go up two thousandths on the primary jets...but they're already at 60, and when I had 62 primaries in the carb there was no appreciable difference.

And here's the other odd thing...if you remove the air cleaner assemby (giving it more air) the hesitation is gone, and the throttle response smoothes out all the way through the spectrum.

So, it seems the hesitation goes away when either more fuel OR more air are introduced...that seems counter-intuitive (at least to me). I'd appreciate any input from you gentlemen.

By Pete 55Tbird - 15 Years Ago
Joey, I am not familiar with BG carbs so this will be just a guess at best. What happens if you close the idle screws on the rear two carb bores? Sounds like too much fuel at idle. The main jets do not operate at idle so they can not influence the black carbon on your plugs that you have.

Is your car a stick or FOM? Seems like a lot of cam for a FOM. Pete 

By GREENBIRD56 - 15 Years Ago
I agree with Pete

It may be due to the klutz with the screw driver (who is writing this) but I had pure hell with the first Road Demon (not the Jr) I got - until I quit trying to use the four corner idle. With those two back mixture screws snugged - everything seemed to work out fine.

 

I think the four corner idle was designed more for use on the open plenum style manifolds than the "cross H" systems we have on our street motors.

By joey - 15 Years Ago
Yes, it is a stick.

So I should just screw in the back mixture screws until they bottom out, and then re-tune the front two?

By pegleg - 15 Years Ago
Joey,

       If you don't have a lean "flat spot" at cruise, or under very slight acceleration, then I'd drop the powervalve (actually INCREASE) it by a half or one inch rating. also check and make sure your air correction jets are open and clean.

By joey - 15 Years Ago
Do you mean if I do have one?
By GREENBIRD56 - 15 Years Ago
I think what Frank's getting at is that lumpy cams will pulse power valves and drip a little fuel through them. Sometimes a change to a lower numbered valve (takes lower vacuum to open) will cut out the pulsing.

And yes I'm suggesting you shut off the secondary idle and just try tuning with the primary screws. It may mean using the center air valve (you mentioned early in your post) in order to maintain your idle transfer position.

By pegleg - 15 Years Ago
Steve, Actually I was thinking he might be going lean until the PV opened. Never considered the pulsing or cycling. You might be right there.

       I don't experience that problem on my ranger (408 Windsor, 850 demon) but I did have to richen the secondary idle circuit to smooth out the idle. Not sure this relates to this problem. But I agree, deleting the secondary idle system will certainly simplify the tuning. You might, possibly, need to increase the secondary spring tension to delay the secondary opening when you close off the idle screws. There will be no fuel flow to help smooth out the transition. When you do this, make sure to close the secondary butterflies completely.

     Joe, you will have a power valve located under the base plate. I phrased that wrong.  

By pegleg - 15 Years Ago
joey (12/20/2010)
Hello gentlemen,

Here's the thing. The engine idles fine at 650-700 rpm and basically runs strong, but under gradual acceleration there is a s-l-i-g-h-t hesitation until the secondaries kick in.

When you slightly choke it manually at normal running temp (giving it more fuel) the hesitation goes away. One might think on the surface that maybe I should go up two thousandths on the primary jets...but they're already at 60, and when I had 62 primaries in the carb there was no appreciable difference.

And here's the other odd thing...if you remove the air cleaner assemby (giving it more air) the hesitation is gone, and the throttle response smoothes out all the way through the spectrum.

So, it seems the hesitation goes away when either more fuel OR more air are introduced...that seems counter-intuitive (at least to me). I'd appreciate any input from you gentlemen.

 I tend to dismiss this because when the intake sound changes it's difficult to be sure you are using the same throttle setting. Try checking this with a vacuum gage, with and W/O the air cleaner.  

By joey - 15 Years Ago
Thank you for your input, gentlemen.

This morning I closed down the secondary idle mix screws while trying the primaries at a bunch of different settings. The result was that the hesitation was still there, while the new settings also created an off-idle bog off varying proportions depending on the new settings.

My next move will be to re-set everything and then go buy a 5.5 power valve and swap out the 6.5 I am running. I'll see where that brings me.

By GREENBIRD56 - 15 Years Ago
Are you still running the Ford-O-Matic arrangement where the bird starts in second gear? And .... do you usually set your mixture screws for best vacuum? or just use a "turns" setting? My outfit always ran OK with a manual upshift from low - but had the hesitation when it had to start out in second.

The Demon carbs seem to have a good fuel air curve adjustment range of "rich/lean" based on float setting - on a hunch I raised the primary bowl slightly above the center and it made quite a change.

By joey - 15 Years Ago
GREENBIRD56 (12/21/2010)
Are you still running the Ford-O-Matic arrangement where the bird starts in second gear? And .... do you usually set your mixture screws for best vacuum? or just use a "turns" setting? My outfit always ran OK with a manual upshift from low - but had the hesitation when it had to start out in second.

The Demon carbs seem to have a good fuel air curve adjustment range of "rich/lean" based on float setting - on a hunch I raised the primary bowl slightly above the center and it made quite a change.

No, mine's not a Fordo, it's the 3-speed manual. The hesitation doesn't happen exactly when you pull out, it comes around a little bit later in the range under the load of acceleration, more pronounced when you're accelerating up a hill. So a different power valve will open up at different vacuum...vacuum is highest at idle...decreases as you accelerate...so if looks like a lean condition, wouldn't I want to go one number higher so you get fuel delivery sooner?

I did set the mix screws for best vacuum back when I first installed the Demon, but found that to be a little lean. I know it's a rich idle now but I can live with that if everything else gets ironed out.

I have had the same hunch regarding the float setting. Right now it's right in the middle of the glass. These floats are real easy to adjust so it's worth a try to elevate it slightly.

By joey - 15 Years Ago
This is from a chapter on performance carb tuning from a book Holley Carbs, Manifolds and Fuel Injection:

"...use as an example a car equipped with a camshaft that provides such low manifold vacuum at idle or part throttle that the power valve opens, giving richer mixtures, or perhaps flutters open and closed due to vacuum fluctuations. In this instance, a power valve that opens at a still lower vacuum should be installed...this ensures that the power valve will not open until its added fuel is needed."

In the past I've figured that you take your idle vacuum reading, cut it in half, then deduct 2 more inches for lopey cam that might cause variances in the vacuum reading.

If I recall right, the last time I checked the vacuum, it was 19 or thereabouts at a low idle. That was with a Holley carb. But without taking another reading, I don't think there should be much difference if any, right?

By charliemccraney - 15 Years Ago
joey (12/21/2010)
No, mine's not a Fordo, it's the3-speed manual. The hesitation doesn't happen exactly when you pull out, it comes around a little bit later in the range under the load of acceleration, more pronounced when you're accelerating up a hill.




Acceleration hard enough that the secondaries might be opening? You might need a different spring for the secondary diaphragm. The wrong spring can cause just that.
By joey - 15 Years Ago
charliemccraney (12/21/2010)

Acceleration hard enough that the secondaries might be opening?

No, it occurs before the secondaries kick in.

By joey - 15 Years Ago
This morning I tried a couple different secondary springs. I had been running the standard spring, and I went up in one measure of stiffness, and later went down one. You could feel the corresponding change in when the secondaries open, but the hesitation occurs before that and is still there.

I'm running a 6.5 power valve now, and am thinking about changing to a 7.5. Or should I try a 5.5?

By charliemccraney - 15 Years Ago
You shouldn't feel the secondaries open at all. This leads me to believe that your secondaries have something to do with it. Secondary spring kits are available which have about 7 springs to choose from.



From my Holley instructions:



"Many people have the misconception that opening the secondary throttles sooner will provide increased performance and quicker drag strip times. Others think they must “feel” a kick when the secondaries engage. Still others believe that they should disconnect the vacuum diaphragm and make the secondaries open mechanically.

Before going any further, lets discuss these points in a reverse order. First, if we could make our vacuum operated secondary carburetors perform better by opening the secondaries mechanically, it would be to our advantage to do so since all that vacuum actuating hardware is expensive and requires much time and money to calibrate. Mechanical secondary carburetors all utilize a secondary pump shot to prevent bogging when the secondaries are opened. Secondly, those who “feel” a kick when the secondaries engage are actually feeling a flat spot during initial acceleration because the secondaries have already begun to open and have weakened the fuel delivery signal to the primary boosters. The engine is struggling to increase speed and what they actually feel are the secondary nozzles “crashing in” as the engine finally reaches he speed where it provides the proper fuel delivery signal to primary and secondary venturi. Third, opening the secondaries early causes the situation described above. The secondaries must not open until the engine requires the additional air. This allows torque to increase along the peak torque curve. Performance is compromised less by holding the secondaries closed a little longer than by opening them a little too soon. If the opening rate of the vacuum operated secondaries is properly calibrated there should not be a “kick”, only a smooth increase in power should be felt."
By Don Woodruff - 15 Years Ago
On your original setup it sounds as if it is an ignition timing problem. Check the advance curve, throw in a bit of timing during the hesitation portion of the drive.
By charliemccraney - 15 Years Ago
To add to my previous post, there is a real easy way to eliminate the secondaries as causing the problem, using the paper clip test. You clip a paper clip onto the actuation rod and slide it up against the vacuum chamber. Go for a spin, get the hesitation to occur. If the secondaries open at all, the paper clip will have moved down the rod. If the paper clip hasn't moved, the secondaries didn't open and you know without a doubt they are not the cause.
By joey - 15 Years Ago
Thanks Charley. I have read that passage too. If the power (probably a better description) that I'm feeling is indeed caused by the secondaries opening early...then I don't know what there's left for me to do, because I've tried all the different secondary springs that came with the carb, across the board.

Don Woodruff (12/22/2010)
On your original setup it sounds as if it is an ignition timing problem. Check the advance curve, throw in a bit of timing during the hesitation portion of the drive.

I was thinking the same thing. Timing is already at 14* BTDC, which should be enough initial ignition for this engine. So after I put everything back together, I went to a stiffer spring inside the distributor, which would "lessen" the timing in the advance curve. As I thought, this made the hesitation worse, and bigger across the rev band. So the issue is at least partially timing-related...which is not news, seeing as just about everything you can mess with is somehow related.

However, with that, I have now also tried all possible spring matchups that Mallory provides (except for single stage curve combinations which they advise to avoid for street use), and have concluded once again that the best combo is the one I had at the beginning of this process...so in essence I'm kinda back to square one.

I think in general what I'm dealing with here is a combination of a somewhat lumpy cam (although I do have good vacuum) coupled with a non-vacuum advance distributor and a pretty big carb which combine to give me some low-end throttle issues.

About the only thing I can think of to try now is the paper clip test that Charley suggests, and then maybe a different power valve. The 6.5 that's on there is pretty standard; given the circumstances surrounding the hesitation, any suggestions as to whether I should go to a 5.5, or a 7.5 ?

By joey - 15 Years Ago
I think it's timing more than anything else. Taking it for another test drive, I pulled over and, what the heck, just advanced the distributor probably another 3-4 degrees, and it made a big difference. Probably I  need to get past the idea that it "should" be timed at the lower degree settings you hear people reference.
By Pete 55Tbird - 15 Years Ago
joey

When you describe the issue you want to fix you said"

Here's the thing. The engine idles fine at 650-700 rpm and basically runs strong, but under gradual acceleration there is a s-l-i-g-h-t hesitation until the secondaries kick in."

      My understanding is with a carb with vacuum secondaries that the secondaries will NEVER OPEN with gradual acceleration as the manifold vacuum will always stay too high. So can you attach a manifold gage that can be seen from the drivers seat and take it for a spin and confirm that the hesitation occures prior to the point that the manifold vacuum drops enough to cause the secondaries to open. If that is the case then forget the power valve - not involved ( vacuum was too high) and forget the secondaries, same reason

You seem to have two seperate problems, the rich mixture at idle and a hesitation on mild acceleration.

A distributor with no vacuum advance may be your problem. Try a factory distributor and see what you get.

By pegleg - 15 Years Ago
I don't know how old your Mallory is, but I have seen older ones where the advance mechanism has worn out to the point that the mechanical advance is very erratic. Sometimes non-existent. Might be an opertune time to rebuild it.
By Dan in Seattle - 15 Years Ago
None of my 3 yblocks have active vac advances and I had each distributor recurved so don't have to chase those gremlins, recurve is only $45. On the tire dyno the engine with the dual 500cfm carbs had a wobble in the power curve with vac advance and the curve smoothed out with it disconnected, considering the over supply intake of this engine I figured that was a good enough test for me. When the dual carb engine is at running temp it has no hesitation or bog, it runs up smoothly instant wide open from 1500 to 5500.



I didn't care to go into it with my carb guy but seem to recall the vac advance was intended to help fuel economy, might give that issue more consideration cause when this engine is being worked it drops fuel like a water bomber. Those mech advance pieces are, by necessity, cheezy little suckers and I make sure they've got correct new springs and are oiled.
By joey - 15 Years Ago
Pete 55Tbird (12/22/2010)
A distributor with no vacuum advance may be your problem. Try a factory distributor and see what you get.

Pete, I have often thought of doing that. But unless I pay big bucks for an original from a '57 Bird or something like that, I'd lose my cable-drive tach. Sad

pegleg (12/22/2010)
I don't know how old your Mallory is, but I have seen older ones where the advance mechanism has worn out to the point that the mechanical advance is very erratic. Sometimes non-existent. Might be an opertune time to rebuild it.

Originally I had a Mallory from the early 1960s and you're right, it was well-worn and pretty erratic. I got this unit new from Concours in Vegas, paid the big bucks...they're specially fit for early Birds and they have the tach drive built in. It's only got a few thousand miles on it.

Dan in Seattle (12/22/2010)
r
ecurve is only $45...seem to recall the vac advance was intended to help fuel economy, might give that issue more consideration cause when this engine is being worked it drops fuel like a water bomber. Those mech advance pieces are, by necessity, cheezy little suckers and I make sure they've got correct new springs and are oiled.

Yeah, when I bought this distributor it was advertised as "tuned" for TBirds, but for my purposes it was still way off. So I bought the advance curve kit from Mallory and, over time, tried all different spring combos and degree advance tabs. I ended up using 24* of mechanical advance, adjusting the spring perches as well in order to get all the advance in pretty early in the curve. Sure, I do burn a ton of gas. The car really gets up and goes at higher rpms but my wife drives the car too, and most of our driving ends up being cruising miles, which obviously is not the strong point of this unit. I think I'm now at an impasse...not much else I can do unless I go to another distributor.

By bird55 - 15 Years Ago
joey (12/23/2010)
Pete 55Tbird (12/22/2010)
A distributor with no vacuum advance may be your problem. Try a factory distributor and see what you get.




Pete, I have often thought of doing that. But unless I pay big bucks for an original from a '57 Bird or something like that, I'd lose my cable-drive tach. Sad



pegleg (12/22/2010)
I don't know how old your Mallory is, but I have seen older ones where the advance mechanism has worn out to the point that the mechanical advance is very erratic. Sometimes non-existent. Might be an opertune time to rebuild it.




Originally I had a Mallory from the early 1960s and you're right, it was well-worn and pretty erratic. I got this unit new from Concours in Vegas, paid the big bucks...they're specially fit for early Birds and they have the tach drive built in. It's only got a few thousand miles on it.



Dan in Seattle (12/22/2010)
r
ecurve is only $45...seem to recall the vac advance was intended to help fuel economy, might give that issue more consideration cause when this engine is being worked it drops fuel like a water bomber. Those mech advance pieces are, by necessity, cheezy little suckers and I make sure they've got correct new springs and are oiled.




Yeah, when I bought this distributor it wasadvertised as "tuned" for TBirds, but for my purposes it was still way off. So I bought the advance curve kit from Mallory and, over time, tried all different spring combos and degree advance tabs. I ended up using 24* of mechanical advance, adjusting the spring perches as well in order to get all the advance in pretty early in the curve. Sure, I do burn a ton of gas. The car really gets up and goes at higher rpms but my wife drives the car too, and most of our driving ends up being cruising miles, which obviously is not the strong point of this unit. I think I'm now at an impasse...not much else I can do unless I go to another distributor.





I think what PETE is suggesting here is "try another mech advance distirbuter setup" - NOT BUY and replace. A full mechanical dizzy either borrowed or bought and built (pretty cheaply as a back up) is a very good way to check out that hesitation. ex: you could buy a plain jane dizzy from napa and have it setup for full mechanical; cheap test.

BTW I run full mech. on my old bird in a factory 57 tach drive with pertronics.