By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Hello, My 60 f250 quit on me the other day. So I did the normal checks i.e. fuel delivery/ spark? fuel is OK. I wasn't getting any spark from the coil. I figured it was a good excuse to convert over to the pertronix electronic ignition and a new 40,000v coil. The cap and rotor are fairly new(both are clean and crack free). After installing the new parts she still isn't firing. I pulled the coil to cap wire and had my son crank the engine while I held the end about 3/16" from the a head bolt. I only got a minor spark at the end of the cranking. the paper work says to disconnect the red wire from the positive side of coil and run a jumper to the positive side of battery. Still nothing. When I checked the resistor wire it showed 5.9 volts. I ran a jumper wire from the ignition to the coil positive side and still nothing. I even ran a jumper from the positive batery to the positive side of coil. and you quess it NOTHING. Please help. I am not the best when it comes to the electronics side of mechanics. I am sure it is something simple that you guys probably are thinking DUH!!! But my head is about to explode and my eyes are crossed from trying to get a better look at the dist. thanks for any advise. James
|
By oldave57 - 14 Years Ago
|
One thing to check is to be sure that the ground wire that runs from the point/condenser mounting plate (and now is the mounting plate for your Pertronix module) is in place and connected. If the ground wire is not present or is not attached, the Pertronix will not function. Regards. Dave
|
By Grizzly - 14 Years Ago
|
James, Check the ground as Dave suggested. If you have a multimeter check that you have a fully charged battery. then if you are running the jumper directly to the coil check that you are indeed getting full voltage. Check your resistance to ground. If all is good but still won't run stick your points back in and see if it will run with them. It could be a damaged or faulty Pertronix unit. If it's a igniter I they don't like being left on without the engine running. You should have 8.5v with the resistor wire. Try to keep it to one change at a time. problems compound and it's harder to trouble shoot if you have multiple problems. The Pertronix unit should have gone into a good running engine. Cheers Warren
|
By MoonShadow - 14 Years Ago
|
I don't think you mentioned it but did you change the coil too? That may be the whole problem. Chuck
|
By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Thanks for the suggestions. I will recheck the ground wire inside the dist. I have already replaced the coil with pertronix's epoxy filled 40,000v. I will also recheck the resistor wire to see what voltage I am getting. I picked up a new wire after lunch today, so if need be I can replace. This truck has had a lot of grounding issues. I have run multiple grounding cables at various locations. Battery is recently new,but I will check as well.
|
By aussiebill - 14 Years Ago
|
dozer59044 (10/15/2011)
Thanks for the suggestions. I will recheck the ground wire inside the dist. I have already replaced the coil with pertronix's epoxy filled 40,000v. I will also recheck the resistor wire to see what voltage I am getting. I picked up a new wire after lunch today, so if need be I can replace. This truck has had a lot of grounding issues. I have run multiple grounding cables at various locations. Battery is recently new,but I will check as well. You mention it has grounding issues, maybe fit heavy earth lead from bock to frame, simple test is to put a jumper lead from block to frame and check for better spark or contacts etc.
|
By oldave57 - 14 Years Ago
|
One thing I neglected to mention earlier. If you have purchased the new Pertronix coil, you will no longer need a resistor in the circuit (some older cars like my 57 had a block resistor and yours apparently has a resistor wire). The Pertronix coil can function fine without a resistor. The original coil would burn out if powered without a resistor. The reason I mention the resistor is that you must not have the resistor in the circuit to power the Pertronix module in the distributor because it must have the full 12 volts in order to function. You did mention that you ran a jumper wire from the battery to the Pertronix, but I just wanted to mention that you need to have 12 volts to the module and that you no longer need a resistor if you have the Pertronix coil. Regards, Dave
|
By JPotter57 - 14 Years Ago
|
Thats what I was thinking Dave...full 12 v with a performance coil.
|
By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Thanks guys, Thats what I was thinking too. So, should I run a new wire from the ignition to the coil? There by eliminating the resistor wire. The paper work from pertronix is a little confusing. the igniter paper says to leave the resistor in place. the coil paper work says to remove the resistor. I am putting a charge on the battery. It was showing 12.48v on a fairly new battery. I am also going to pull the igniter out and clean the mounting area again. especially where the ground connects. Thanks again for the advice James
|
By oldcarmark - 14 Years Ago
|
If you change to their coil it has correct resistance that you can discard the resistor.Run a new wire from ignition switch if you have a resistor wire instead of an external one which can be bypassed.If you want to be sure you have good ground for the distributor clamp a booster cable on the body and to the negative post on battery.i agree you should re-install points condensor and get it running first and than install the Pertronix.If you have the original Pertronix(1) you cant leave the ignition turned on without the motor running.You will fry it in short order.The Pertronix(2) which I have eliminated that problem.Thats the main difference between the 2.
|
By GREENBIRD56 - 14 Years Ago
|
This photo shows the braided "jumper" provided in the points distributor to maintain the ground for the point plate as it swivels with the advance mechanism...the old Pertronix instruction didn't even mention it - but you need to retain it. 
Because it only has to ground the points to the block for charging and firing the coil - it has historically worked OK to let the distributor body provide the rest of the grounding circuit. I think it is best for the electronic versions to be fitted with a wire that goes clear out to the block.
|
By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Ok, one more stupid question. On the OEM coil the post are marked batt. and dist. Now am I correct in my thinking that batt. is positive and dist. is negative. Just thought I better check. been under the hood too long things are getting blurry. I have run a new wire from the ignition to the coil,eliminating the resistor wire. I have a full 12v at the coil. Still no fire. I have installed a ground strap from block to frame,block to firewall,battery to firewall, battery to block. My next step is to re-install the OEM pionts and condenser. James
|
By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Probably not a bad idea Steve. It couldn't hurt. Thanks, ```````````````````````
|
By oldave57 - 14 Years Ago
|
I have attached a photo that shows the connections to the Pertronix coil. There are (3) connections to the hot (+) side and (1) connection to the negative (-) side: The plus side (batt side) gets the red wire from the Pertronix module in the distributor and also gets the new wire (from ignition). The 3rd wire is from the start circuit of the ignition switch. On the original circuit, the start circuit bypasses the resistor and delivers full voltage during cranking (which is really reduced to around 8.5 or 9 volts during cranking). The 3rd wire might be missing from your installation, but I think you might need to add it because the ignition wire you added might actually "drop out" when you are in the crank mode. You could test this with a test light on the new circuit you added to see if it blanks out when cranking. The negative (-) side of the coil gets the black wire from the Pertronix module in the distributor. Good luck with your installation. Dave 
|
By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Well, I got it to fire. engine starts. I think that now I have a carb problem. i am getting fuel when I manually operate the throttle(looking down the throat). But if i give it any throttle when it is running it stumbles and backfires thru carb. It is a manual choke so I know its not the chock. The throttle feels spongy.
|
By oldcarmark - 14 Years Ago
|
You didnt by some chance change the spark plug wires around and mess up the firing order or move the distributor changing the timing?
|
By aussiebill - 14 Years Ago
|
dozer59044 (10/16/2011) Well, I got it to fire. engine starts. I think that now I have a carb problem. i am getting fuel when I manually operate the throttle(looking down the throat). But if i give it any throttle when it is running it stumbles and backfires thru carb. It is a manual choke so I know its not the chock. The throttle feels spongy.Sounds retarded to me, advance distributor till engine revs increase slightly, retard dist till engine starts to die then set at middle rpm range, then see if it behaves itself.
|
By Grizzly - 14 Years Ago
|
I'm with Bill. I had to reset my timing after I installed the Pertronix II in my car. The unit sits in roughly the same place as the points but only good enough to start it. It needed timing after that. BTW my system had the resistor removed before I bought the car it runs full battery voltage to the coil via the ignition. a Bosch GT40 transistor coil. Cheers Warren
|
By GREENBIRD56 - 14 Years Ago
|
I think the guys are right about the change in timing due to the change in coil firing position between the points and the Pertronix spark module. It sure doesn't "have to be " the same firing point ..........use a 10° initial setting (vacuum line disconnected and plugged) and see how that goes. This diagram below shows the location of the "starting jumper" that Ford and others used for many years. It provides direct battery power to the coil (+) terminal when the starter solenoid is engaged. You just don't want (or need) the ballast resistance in the ignition feed. So long as the coil has 1.5 OHMs in the primary it will lower the AMPs enough for the Pertronix module. 
The (-) post goes back to the Pertronix module. How old is the gas in your outfit - we've all been suffering lately from letting our toys sit with "modern" junk gas in them.
|
By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Thanks again for the input. I will re-set the timing once my new plug wires come in. Had the wrong ones shipped to me. I have been reading in my shop manual about the vacuum governor on this 4 barrel carb. it may be giving me some of the problem. The throttle operation feels odd. As far as the age of the gas its a daily driver so If I remember right I gased up last week after pulling a load of wood down from the beartooth mountains. So now I wait for parts. Thanks guys. James
|
By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Good evening, I have installed new plug wires. It still did not want to run . So, I move on to resetting timing. It's been about thirty years since I timed an engine by ear. I got it to run much better. But as soon as i hook the vacuum line back to the governor on the carb it starts to run rough and has slow throttle response. Could it be the vacuum advance failing?
|
By dozer59044 - 14 Years Ago
|
Well, I took some carb cleaner and scrubbed the harmonic balancer. Low and behold I actually found the timing marks buried under paint and gunk. tried to set at 4 to 6 degrees as the manual says to but it run rough and back fires. I had to set it at 15 degrees and about 2300 rpm just to get it to run half way decent. I am thinking I may have jumped a tooth or two on the timing chain. that would explain why it suddenly started running very poorly. What do you guys think?
|
By MoonShadow - 14 Years Ago
|
There is a good chance that the damper has slipped. Especialy if it was gunked up. Chuck
|
By aussiebill - 14 Years Ago
|
dozer59044 (10/21/2011) Well, I took some carb cleaner and scrubbed the harmonic balancer. Low and behold I actually found the timing marks buried under paint and gunk. tried to set at 4 to 6 degrees as the manual says to but it run rough and back fires. I had to set it at 15 degrees and about 2300 rpm just to get it to run half way decent. I am thinking I may have jumped a tooth or two on the timing chain. that would explain why it suddenly started running very poorly. What do you guys think?Jumping teeth is pretty unheard of in y blocks, Chucks suggestion is closer to the mark, either work out TDC with plug removed and mark on edge of belt pulley and time it by ear or the new marks. Book timing is for new to engines in good condition and does not apply exactley with all the worn components running together. Why not bypass governer operation if possible. Just my view.
|