Profile Picture

F-Bird cylinder block and heads

Posted By 55ebird 11 Years Ago
You don't have permission to rate!
Author
Message
pegleg
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Years Ago
Posts: 3.0K, Visits: 8.7K
The " Blower" cam that I have was made by Engle from a new core. We added some exhaust duration to help with being forced to run manifolds and full exhaust. It works pretty well at the strip, (best of 105.6 MPH) but is reasonable on the street with 3.25's. A little rumbely at idle of 700 RPM.











Frank/Rebop

Bristol, In ( by Elkhart) 


Rudder2fly
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 160, Visits: 35.5K
Looks like the 406  was new in 1962 Fords. Gene S.

56 VIC  Gene Stoehr Sr.
charliemccraney
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Last Active: 11 hours ago
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 442.4K
I have what is suppose to be a repop of the blower cam that Mummert produced a long time ago.  While it certainly has an impact on low end torque, I can still do truck stuff with it.  I wouldn't want to all the time, but it gets the job done, when needed.  If you used it strictly as a truck, then the cam would be terrible but for a fun street cruiser or street/strip truck that does occasional truck stuff, it is fine.  I've had this cam in 2 engines, one a very mild 292, and the current stroker and in both cases, I have the same opinion.



Lawrenceville, GA
2721955meteor
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 927, Visits: 190.0K
in the mid 80s  i was doing a 312 for a young man,sent the cam to the camgrinder ,he called and wantd to trade cores as he had a customer with supercharged bird and needed the core ,which  he claimed had special markings. i traded him as he advised that the blower grind would not work well in the na 312 going into a 56 pickup.(it was barrey at shadbolt cams who i did and still do deal with) i would be inclined to take his word. he also stated they did research for ford as in canada ford had cronic cam failures in 1956,something to do with the parkerizing process. hope some of the ford retirees will confirm or deny this. i am very interested in failure analysis as took training from cat.  not trying to say any  one is right or wrong,just hungrey  for acurate info. cliff
2721955meteor
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 927, Visits: 190.0K
Rudder2fly (11/28/2014)
!962 is the correct publishing date. I have the magazine in hand. Gene Stoehr.


myn has a picture of a 406 on the cover late 62,when did  the 1st 406s com,they  became 427s mid 63
pegleg
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Years Ago
Posts: 3.0K, Visits: 8.7K
Meteor, 
           The standard F code motors used the same cam as the D or 245 hp engine. In other words they all had the same cam in 1957.
       There was an optional camshaft available in both the E code and F code engines. Standard cam ratings were 270 and 300 hp.
The optional cam, which has been called the F code cam shaft was rated at 285 and 340 hp respectfully. I am not sure the factory ever actually used those ratings, I believe that those were AAA and NHRA ratings for class purposes only. Then everyone began to use those numbers to identify engines with the optional parts.

Frank/Rebop

Bristol, In ( by Elkhart) 


Rudder2fly
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)Supercharged (361 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 160, Visits: 35.5K
!962 is the correct publishing date. I have the magazine in hand. Gene Stoehr.


56 VIC  Gene Stoehr Sr.
PF Arcand
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K, Visits: 238.8K
.. Meteor: I don't have a copy of the Ford Performance Handbook by Ray Brock, but remember seeing it & if I recall (?) it was from 1962.. 


Paul
2721955meteor
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)Supercharged (2.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 927, Visits: 190.0K
super charged engines have a different cam ,as well as heads cam part# wasb7a 6250-c  io 32  ic78  eo78  ec32  duration290 with 1.54 rockers. local cam grinder has thepatern to redo1.
head # isb7a6049e with casting #edb-d,or edbb-e. this info is from  ford performance hand book by ray brock no date on the publication, i paid the going rate of 1us dollor. another old ford manual claims the #for heads is b7a 6049-e cast#edb-d  edb-e

how factual remains to be comented,interesting manuals.cliff
pegleg
Posted 11 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)Supercharged (4.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Years Ago
Posts: 3.0K, Visits: 8.7K

the short blocks for all the 57 312's are the same. Heads and intake were special.

Frank/Rebop

Bristol, In ( by Elkhart) 




Reading This Topic


Site Meter