Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 884,
Visits: 14.3K
|
What would be the optimum rear gear ratio for a 292 with a T85 OD? I'm going to go through my Dana 44 in my wagon while I am doing the engine swap. I finally found and bought the T85 OD I've been looking for so it is going in too.
Durham Missouri
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 476,
Visits: 22.0K
|
3.89 to 4.11 were the usual axle ratios in OD cars. The OD effectively reduces those figures by 30%, so a 3.89 becomes a 2.72; a 4.11 becomes a 2.877. I wouldn't go any taller than a 3.89; you want to keep the engine RPM in the fat part of the torque curve when you're in OD on the highway.
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 559,
Visits: 8.3K
|
In my 55 crown i ran 3.78 with od, in my 57 I had 3.70 , both cars came from the factory with these gears
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 179.6K
|
62bigwindow. All good thoughts from others. Several variables to consider... - tire size - engine cubic inches (engine torque)... a stock 292 has more basic grunt than a 272, but less than a 312. - engine camshaft (horsepower and torque curve)... stock or degree of performance (lift, duration, overlap, lobe center angle). - engine compression ratio... makes a difference in pulling ability. - intended use (type of driving... stop-and-go [city], terrain [hills or flat], highway [elevated rpm], vehicle weight, and loading expectations
The T-85s have a 2.49:1 1st gear ratio... 1st gear is not synchronized when down shifting... The T-85 R-11 overdrives drop the final drive output ratio from 1:1 to 0.72:1 Borg Warner intended the overdrive to only be used with the tranny in 3rd gear.
NoShortcuts a.k.a. Charlie Brown near Syracuse, New York
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 days ago
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 194.1K
|
In my mis spent youth, I put a Dana 44 with a 4:27-1 rear from a 6 cyl. O/D wagon. 312 motor, T-85 O/D, 27+" tire. In a 55 bird, so it was a little lighter. That was a nice ratio, had enough torque in 2nd to avoid having to double clutch to low all the time.
Dana ratios are a little different than 9". The other thing to watch, if you're thinking posi, the carrier changes at around 3.7 or so. I can't recall exactly, but one carrier for that down, and other for up.
miker 55 bird, 32 cabrio F code Kent, WA Tucson, AZ
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 884,
Visits: 14.3K
|
Thanks guys. I think I will try the 3.89. My engine is warmed over with 9:1 comp and a mid range cam with mild porting on the heads with bigger valves. It should be around 275-290 hp. Most if not all the driving will be highway with some town driving. The tire size is 670-15. I plan on replacing everything including the axles and stepping up to a limited slip diff.
Durham Missouri
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 days ago
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 194.1K
|
You might find something I missed, but what I found was 3.73, or 3.92. That's also the break point on the posi carrier. I've got the 3.73 in the car now, as I was too cheap to change the posi to do the 3.92. I had to go look it all up, can't trust the memory anymore.
miker 55 bird, 32 cabrio F code Kent, WA Tucson, AZ
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 884,
Visits: 14.3K
|
How well so you like the 3.73? Are you running overdrive?
Durham Missouri
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 729,
Visits: 112.0K
|
Don't have a Dana so I used 3.89 in my 9". I live in hilly terrain so that gear works great and cruises on the hiway with ease when in OD..
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 464,
Visits: 183.3K
|
You need a 4.11 or higher numerically in a wagon from my experience.
"FREE SAMPLE"
|