Hitting on all eight cylinders
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 15 Years Ago
Posts: 15,
Visits: 92
|
hey thanks for the info
restoring after 50 years
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Years Ago
Posts: 3.0K,
Visits: 8.7K
|
Johnson Rod is absolutely correct on the anti-seize statement. Also, be a little careful, some of the kits use a grade of SS that's not as strong as the original Ford Fastners! ALWAYS use Never-seize or equal with them.
Frank/RebopBristol, In ( by Elkhart) 
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 238.8K
|
Johnson is alluding to the fact that stainless fasteners have a tendency to "gall" when really tightened up. Not to mention the extra cost involved in using them. I don't believe the Y-blk engine gurus normally use stainless for things like Head bolts, even for performance applications. Someone else may want to comment further on this.
Paul
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 15 Years Ago
Posts: 142,
Visits: 838
|
Remember to use an anti-seize compound on the threads of stainless fasteners...
Johnson Rod
Southern California
|
Hitting on all eight cylinders
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 15 Years Ago
Posts: 15,
Visits: 92
|
did you use the 217 piece or the 120 grade 8 kit
restoring after 50 years
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 14 hours ago
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 497.7K
|
Ive used the kits that are advertised on ebay. No problems with torque settings, but the only ones I really pay attention to is the intake manifold (no head bolts or other critical torque setting bolts are included in the kit I bought).
54 Victoria 312; 48 Ford Conv 302, 56 Bird 312
Forever Ford
Midland Park, NJ
|
Hitting on all eight cylinders
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 15 Years Ago
Posts: 15,
Visits: 92
|
Has anyone ever used stainless bolt kits for a 292 rebuild? Does that change any torque specs or any pros or cons to doing this?
restoring after 50 years
|