Pete 55Tbird (10/7/2008)
OK, this is about a "built" 312 and then the owner puts a holley 390 on it for whatever reason. The cam pulls 11.5 inches of vacuum in drive at idle. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE? You have a "Blue thunder manifold" and then whimp out on the carb? Now you try to tune the carb to get it to work with a FOM? For the record a FOM ALWAYS STARTS IN 2nd GEAR. Lots of things that should be changed, IMHO but the first is the camshaft. What were you thinking when you chose that cam? If you wanted RUMP RUMP there are better choices. You got some bad advice. It is NOT THE CARB. Only my opinion and not the popular one at that. PeteUmmm.... not really sure what calls for the attitude, but at least get your facts straight and read the issue and other parts of the thread before you get on your high horse. My engine is a 292, not a 312. I never cleaimed that it was "built" for a high performance. If you do the math, the 390 CFM should be right for an engine of that size at 5500 revs, assuming 85% VE, (which is optimistic).... Ill do the math for you; it calculates out to needing 394 CFM based on those variables.
MOREOVER - if you read the beginning of the thread, I have an edelbrock 500 cfm & a holley 390 (do you approve of the edelbrock?). the POINT of this thread, as stated, was that I wanted to see how good I could get it to run with the 390, as that SHOULD be enough carb and give a little better throttle response. Once i got it running as good as possible on the 390, I am going to work on the edelbrock a bit more and from there figure out which one I like better.
And also FOR THE RECORD, the FOM doesnt ALWAYS start in 2nd gear... if you go to WOT from a dead stop, it will drop into 1st and function like a regular 3 speed auto.
And as for cam recommendation, it was after several long conversations with John Mummert, whom I trust. he seems to know a *little bit* about these engines.
BACK TO THE POINT - I would like again to thank those who have contributed their knowledge & expertise to help me trouble shoot a carb problem that I never would have found. Ted, regarding your power valve restriction comments - is that a matter of opening the port on the PV itself, or does it involve opening a passage in the carb body?
THANKS AGAIN to those who have been very helpful in sorting out the 390 carb!
Ron
Ron Grove
Wauconda, IL