Dave,
In answer to your questions from the PM, I took the liberty to also show my answer here for anyone else who might be interested.
The cam in our original motor is a re-grind #34 from Oregon Cams. The new engine will have a #686 grind. The old engine had a calculated 310 hp at the flywheel (250 at the rear wheel). With the new engine we hope to see 340 hp at the flywheel (275 at the rear wheel). These numbers may not be big compared to others, but remember, we only have 258 cubic inches. Engine builder Tim McMaster also uses re-ground lifters to go with the re-ground cams.
The specs on #34 is.........
Duration at .050 for intake = 250 for exhaust = 250
Lobe separation 107
Total lift (1.54:1 rockers) .508 (for both intake and exhaust)
Lobe center for intake = 102 for exhaust = 112
This is a wild cam and would hardly idle below 1600 rpm. It worked great for us, but now we are looking for a little more.
The specs on #686 is.........
Duration at .050 for intake = 252 for exhaust = 260
Lobe separation 112
Total lift (1.54:1 rockers) for intake = .545 for exhaust = 562
Lobe center for intake = 108 for exhaust = 116
This cam should be even more wild with a higher idle. It is still unproven for us, but with higher compression, better porting and a few race tricks, we have great expectations.
I know the reluctance to go with a re-grind instead of a new blank from someone like CompCams. In 2006, our first re-grind cam was from some shop in LA and I didn't use break-in oil or an additive. It went flat (all my fault) while breaking it in during the first 20 minutes. However, I purchased lots of break-in additive from CompCams and we have confidence that the cam will be OK even with the re-ground lifters.
I have whipped this little pony many times during the last two seasons and it has never let me down (accolades to Tim McMaster). In the final analysis, we will stay with re-grinds on both the cam and lifters.
Hope this helps.................
Charlie Burns Laton, Ca (South of Fresno)

BurnsRacing981@gmail.com