
(quote) If Mellings (& others) use effective length & Clevite uses overall length, now we're are trying to compare apples & oranges....Ford and others use overall length, seems melling is one of the few that use effective length, just goes to show when you order one has to ask many questions.
The picures above: left to right are new Elgin pushrod, original 57 Merc 312 pushrod, next original 56 Ford 272 pushrod (note larger cup head OD on the 57 vs 56 beside it) and furthest right NOS E&F code pushrod.
I had a little time today to do some measurements on pushrods, these measurements maybe not 100% accurate as I used a vernier caliper.
New Elgin pushrod overall 8.131", socket depth 0.150", effective length 7.981"
Original 57 merc pushrod 8.139", socket depth 0.145", effective length 7.991"
Original 56 272 pushrod 8.10", socket depth 0.113", effective length 7.986"
NOS Ford E&F code pushrod 8.068", socket depth 0.187", effective length 7.881"
You can see all the pushrods except the E&F code pushrod are within +/- ).005" of each other
The Melling effective length of 7.967 would be slightly shorter by 20 thou +/- 5 thou
The E&F cade pushrod is about 30 thou shorter overall however is about 100 thou shorter on effective length as it has a very deep socket of 0.187"
One thing I thought about is does the Dove rocker has a recess above the socket ball to allow clearance for the pushrod to have free movement when the valve is in max open position. If it does not have this clearance when valve is fully open the cup could become very leveraged and break as the pictures show. I don't have Dove rocker to compare and the pictures do not show the adjuster stud and ball clearly.
marv