Profile Picture

57 Tbird Steady Rests

Posted By MarkMontereyBay 15 Years Ago
You don't have permission to rate!
Author
Message
Doug T
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (777 reputation)Supercharged (777 reputation)Supercharged (777 reputation)Supercharged (777 reputation)Supercharged (777 reputation)Supercharged (777 reputation)Supercharged (777 reputation)Supercharged (777 reputation)Supercharged (777 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 563, Visits: 2.6K
The T bird steady rests are absolutely necessary in the T Bird chassis.  When I and my car were much younger I broke them both by sliding off an icy road and hitting a curb.  As someone described above the engine just flopped over with the slightest throttle opening without the steady rests. So you definitely need them.

There is another current thread that has some discussion of the span of the engine-trany mounts.  It was appearantly a FoMoCo design criteria for the Y that the engine-trany assy be very stiff because the 49 and up flatty with its front mounts and the trany with the undermount had a pronounced sag! Ford engineers used oportunity of the Y's deep block skirt to locate the two lower bellhousing bolts  below the crank centerline giving the whole engine bell housing trany increased stiffness.

 It would also be instructive to take a look at the truck bell housings which have a pair of gussets running to the two upper bolts. They are likely there to support the tension load of the tranys hanging off the back of the engine. 

It would be my opinion that the block itself can stand the span issue.  But the real question is if the flatomatic bell housing has been designed (or tested in a lot of applications) to live comfortably in an application with a long span between the front and rear mounts.

Doug T

The Highlands, Louisville, Ky.


paul2748
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 497.7K
I will add that they also provide some engine/trans support in the middle of the long mounting points

54 Victoria 312;  48 Ford Conv 302, 56 Bird 312
Forever Ford
Midland Park, NJ

paul2748
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)Supercharged (6.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 497.7K
I'm running them. If you look at the front and rear motor mounts, they are on a very small mount width wise and do not provide much support for side to side (rocking) motion. I know Ford had in the past put on extra items such as the passenger car front steady rests and later deleted them as unnecessary??? but in this case, it would seem these are essential.

54 Victoria 312;  48 Ford Conv 302, 56 Bird 312
Forever Ford
Midland Park, NJ

MarkMontereyBay
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 6 Years Ago
Posts: 733, Visits: 3.8K
Is anybody running an Bird without steady rests? I have looked at the article about fabricating a new set for headers. Are they necessary for a street car?

57 Black Tbird 312/auto





Reading This Topic


Site Meter