Grizzly (3/18/2011)
Guys,
Planet earth is a fish bowl and what they get we get. Nuclear power is the most dirtiest form of power. I hate tobe the greeny but what the f**k do you do with waste that last 200k years. These babies fail every few years. The more the merrier.
At least we knew where we were with fossil fuels.
Glowing
WarrenIt'll be around much longer than 200k years. Uranium 238 has a half-life of nearly 4.5 billion years. Uranium 235 has a half-life of about 7 hundred million years. Uranium 234 has a half-life of abour 245,000 years. The power plants use 238 or 235 depending on the reactor, most are the 235 variety.
As far as the reactors being dirty, Uranium 235 releases about 3,000,000 time more energy than an equivalent mass of coal, so while standing next to a piece of coal won't kill you as the uranium will, the volume of waste produced at a nuclear plant is much less, and that waste can be confined to a specific area whereas coal smoke goes where it will via the atmosphere. Because so much less is needed, the impact of mining on the environment is lessened as well. Nuclear power also takes away the joy of breathing coal smoke.
I don't think nuclear power is the ultimate answer but it's a step toward the right, clean technology. It is progress. I personally would rather see a Nuclear plant on the horizon, than black smoke out of a coal stack.
Edit: Apparently they use Plutonium at the affected power plant. Plutonium 239 has a half life of just over 24,000 years, so depending on the mass it could be virtually gone in a couple hundred thousand years.
I just saw Franks post, and I have to say that I agree 100%. This isn't a typical Nuclear incident. I seem to remember from studying Chernobyl that it was more a result of misinformation and bad decisions that led to the meltdown than some mechanical failure - that my friends is human error and there is no fix for that. It doesn't mean we should abandon a technology because something might happen.
Lawrenceville, GA