Profile Picture

What is the prefered T-5 behind a 292 in a 64 truck

Posted By lrs30 14 Years Ago
You don't have permission to rate!
Author
Message
lrs30
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Normally aspirated

Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 14 Years Ago
Posts: 27, Visits: 77
I have a line on a 2000 Mustang 5 speed. Will this year work? I believe it has the electronic speedo, is there a way to convert it to mechanical? And which clutch and fly-wheel will work, the one in the truck or the one from the Mustang?I have searched on here and came up with lots of info. But not much about these questions I posted above, that or I am just a forum idiot (which probably is true)..lol  It will be going into my 1964 F-100 which still has its original 292 3 speed..
charliemccraney
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Last Active: 8 hours ago
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 442.6K
Are you sure it's a T5? I don't believe a 2000 model will have a T5.


Lawrenceville, GA
lrs30
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Normally aspirated

Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 14 Years Ago
Posts: 27, Visits: 77
to be honest I'm not sure. He said it was, I need to look into that.. Thanks for the tip, I guess I would have found out after I went and looked at it..lol
charliemccraney
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Last Active: 8 hours ago
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 442.6K
Well, if it is a T5, the newer ones, after '93 have a longer input shaft. You will have to use an adapter plate to mount it and even then you may have to space it out further.

The following is accurate with regard to the '93 and earlier units but may not apply to the later units. To convert to mechanical, remove pulse generator, install the 3 speed cable. It's that easy, though you may need a new drive gear to get the speedometer accurate. You will need your truck's flywheel. The clutch required can't really be determined until you have all other parts in hand. You do not need any of the Mustang clutch components.



If it's not a T5, you will be a pioneer.


Lawrenceville, GA
shakey pete
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Turbocharged

Turbocharged (66 reputation)Turbocharged (66 reputation)Turbocharged (66 reputation)Turbocharged (66 reputation)Turbocharged (66 reputation)Turbocharged (66 reputation)Turbocharged (66 reputation)Turbocharged (66 reputation)Turbocharged (66 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 14 Years Ago
Posts: 66, Visits: 211
 hi  for what its worth use a t5 trans from a mustang 1983 to 1992 because you can use most of your clutch assem just change your disk  and modify your bell  housing because a truck has rear mounts and is different than a cars and you can used all your mechanical linkage and speedo move your rear mount and lenthen the drive shaft with anew yoke assem from a mustang  this is what info I have found because I,m going to do the same to my 54 mer.     shakey Pete  (john mummets site) don,t use above 1993 trans
y-block don
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Turbocharged

Turbocharged (71 reputation)Turbocharged (71 reputation)Turbocharged (71 reputation)Turbocharged (71 reputation)Turbocharged (71 reputation)Turbocharged (71 reputation)Turbocharged (71 reputation)Turbocharged (71 reputation)Turbocharged (71 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 14 Years Ago
Posts: 71, Visits: 478
95 and up mustangs had the modular motors and that is a total diff trans altogether Smile

y-block newbie
charliemccraney
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Last Active: 8 hours ago
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 442.6K
shakey pete (1/11/2011)
hi for what its worth use a t5 trans from a mustang 1983 to 1992 because you can use most of your clutch assem just change your disk...




Maybe. Get the transmission first, and then we can determine what needs to be done for the clutch.



If the input bearing retainer looks like this:







You will need an entirely different clutch and throwout bearing. However, transmissions with that retainer are typically the stronger units so don't let the need for a different clutch scare you away.


Lawrenceville, GA
lrs30
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Normally aspirated

Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)Normally aspirated (27 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 14 Years Ago
Posts: 27, Visits: 77
I am gonna look for a 93 and earlier, just to be on the safe side. I don't want to be a pioneer, I will just follow the trail that was already cleared....ha
1955customline
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Hitting on all eight cylinders

Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)Hitting on all eight cylinders (6 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 14 Years Ago
Posts: 6, Visits: 27
The later model Stangs use a T3650 with a cast with case bellhousing.

1955 Ford Customline 4 door 272 3 speed
Ted
Posted 14 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Co-Administrator

Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.3K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Last Active: 8 hours ago
Posts: 7.4K, Visits: 205.7K
Not familiar with a T3650 but my ’97 Mustang has a Borg Warner T-45 five speed which also has an integral bellhousing.  I'll add that those intregal bellhousings simply adds to the complexity of allowing those particular trannies to be used easily on anything other than what they were originally designed for.

Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)




Reading This Topic


Site Meter