Thanks frank and all the other guys for their delicate input into my reaction on the machining finish of these heads, 1st of all i regard johns efforts highly and as a friend, as with everyone else here!!!! I felt my reply from john was less than satisfying and gingerly sought ideas and comparisons from the guys running these heads, i think i have the right to do this no matter how others may percieve it, the reactions were favourable and at last john added that his advertised pictured heads had the marks lightly sanded flat, why was that? obviously it is far more how normally machined heads or decked blocks should look, had mine been finished this way, i,m sure i wouldnt have any questions, fair enough!
I dont feel i have caused john to spend more money to sort this out, if anyone wanting heads and like the heads this way tell him and he wont have to do it!!!!
Also " not wanting to get offside with john" as quoted was also a major consideration and human nature as it is may be so? but i,m sure john can see both sides of this.
I posted this but after rereading it, i thought stuff it! Frank, or anybody else! just say i used these heads as they were and for whatever reason the gasket blew between the cyls, i would immediatly conclude the groove contributed to it as normal heads are flat looking and after the massive expense , its nearly twice the US price! the new head may? burn a groove through it and its gone , with no comeback. thats WHY i asked about this! and i dont care how many things you or anybody else has made, the,re my heads!! And why i have to justify myself to anybody is beyond me!!
I again reiterate! This was and is not a personal attack on john but as i explained above. thank you.
AussieBill YYYY Forever Y Block YYYY
Down Under, Australia