Profile Picture

Replacement exhaust valves

Posted By PF Arcand 12 Years Ago
You don't have permission to rate!
Author
Message
PF Arcand
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K, Visits: 238.8K
Thanks J.M. for the clarifications.. That takes the 351W exhausts idea off the board.

Paul
John Mummert
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 912, Visits: 7.4K
Paul, the original Y-Block valves are commonly listed as 5.090" OAL. The keeper groove is .200" down from the end of the stem. The 351 Windsor valves have the keeper groove .390-.400" down. Most aftermarket valves have the keeper groove .250" down. I wanted to use 351W exhaust valves in the aluminum heads but all the valves made to fit the factory heads have the .400" length to be compatible with rail rockers. All the aftermarket heads for 351W's have 1.60" exhaust valves or larger. So, we had to have valves made for the new heads. They have the groove .250" down from the end.

http://ford-y-block.com 

20 miles east of San Diego, 20 miles north of Mexico

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/2c0ef4dd-5dd8-408e-ba0d-74f6.jpg


PF Arcand
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K, Visits: 238.8K
I stand corrected gentlemen, they're 90 thousands or 3/32" shorter.. wishful thinking on my part, led me astray. Back to where I started again!.. P.S.- my part excuse for the mistakes is that our cordless keyboard is acting up & actually quite just after this.. We went thru Microsofts procedure to get it up again, but it's acting up again even as I use it now.. So ???

Paul
ian57tbird
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (1.1K reputation)Supercharged (1.1K reputation)Supercharged (1.1K reputation)Supercharged (1.1K reputation)Supercharged (1.1K reputation)Supercharged (1.1K reputation)Supercharged (1.1K reputation)Supercharged (1.1K reputation)Supercharged (1.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 498, Visits: 21.7K
My mental calculating isn't what it used to be, but I think that's 90 thou longer if the original is 5.02"
charliemccraney
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 442.5K
.09 is 9 hundredths. That is about 3/32", quite a big difference.


Lawrenceville, GA
PF Arcand
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K, Visits: 238.8K
Slick & John: Thanks for your efforts. Still trying to get my thick head around all this info. However, I did find the OE valve length specs in my 57 manual. All valves were 5.02" long. Slick, you say that both heads you disassembled had valves that are 1.54 " diameter? If so, neither appear to be original spec. From the manual's illistration & John's observation re possible coil bind, the valve you have with the low single groove appears to be well off original specs.. At this point in time, it looks like if I want to pursue this futher, it will require removing an exhaust valve & trying to find a Ford dealer or parts outfit, that has an early (69-74) 351W exhaust valve in stock to match up too.. A side note, just checked Mummert's site & noted the Stainless steel 1.54" exhaust valves he equipes his new aluminum heads with, are 5.11" long. That's only 0.09" (9 thousands) shorter than original, am I correct?.. Hmm?

Paul
slick56
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Months Ago
Posts: 460, Visits: 4.5K
This engine wasn't run that way for long!! It has a new cross drilled(Low lift) cam, and when pulling it down i found a broken rocker shaft.
We have just pilled an exhaust valve out of each head; both heads have 1.54 valves, but the valve in the G head has two collet grooves,
the second groove approx .230" higher.


The G valve measures 5.150 oa, the C measuring 5.070 oa (well, according to my ichy micki vernier).
The workshop manual does not give valve length.

From the bottom of the valve to the top of the lower collet groove measures 4.655 on the C valve, and 4.700 on the G.

Valve with dual keeper grooves has # K9911005 stamped on stem, other valve has # 1761 on it.

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/Uploads/Images/eeace395-726b-4eba-981b-3202.jpg


.


South Australia




Hoosier Hurricane
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (5.0K reputation)Supercharged (5.0K reputation)Supercharged (5.0K reputation)Supercharged (5.0K reputation)Supercharged (5.0K reputation)Supercharged (5.0K reputation)Supercharged (5.0K reputation)Supercharged (5.0K reputation)Supercharged (5.0K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Last Active: 9 hours ago
Posts: 3.7K, Visits: 322.8K
Slick '56:

From your measurements, it appears that the valve springs are compressed .247 more than on a stock Y Block. I would be concerned about the springs becoming coil bound at full lift. But since it has been run that way, that issue was resolved. Maybe shorter, stiffer springs than original?

John - "The Hoosier Hurricane"
http://www.y-blocksforever.com/avatars/johnf.jpg
slick56
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)Supercharged (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Months Ago
Posts: 460, Visits: 4.5K
Hi Paul, confusion reigns!

I have just had a look at the C heads with the 1.54 exhaust and 1.84 intake valves. These have the two piece original-style retainers,
and measure approx. 1.744 from bottom of spring to top of retainer. The valve stem sits .236 above the inner dish of the retainer.

On the G heads with the standard valves and one piece retainer, the measurement is 1.991 from bottom of spring to top of retainer,
with .115 of valve stem showing above retainer.

I think the valve stems have been machined quite heavily, as the G heads are virtually worn out,
has been skimmed .050 and had a blowup at some stage, pock-marked combustion chamber in one cylinder.


Due to a shoulder op a few weeks ago i cannot operate the valve spring compressor, but a mate is supposed to be coming over tomorrow
so i will get him to pull a valve from each head to measure.


Mummert offers +.050 valve locks, i will call him tomorrow also to enquire, as i have just ordered cam, springs, retainers and locks from him,
but i will be running the C heads on the 292 (mild street).


Let you know...


South Australia




PF Arcand
Posted 12 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K, Visits: 238.8K
Slick: On re reading the question from Brazil & Mctim's response you may be correct, his answer appears to be for Cleveland valves, not the 351 Windsors I asked about. Sorry, my misread.. Unfortunately, this inquiry has gone full circle, and despite the much appreciated contributions of several people, I still don't know if early 351 Windsor, 1.54" exhaust valves, can be used without re machining their lock grooves or if they may require unspecified different than Y- Block key locks etc.?

Paul


Reading This Topic


Site Meter